Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Is Rick Santorum's favorite charity HIMSELF?

Mitt Romney has always been a very charitable person:

Romney charitable contributions:

Tax year (Taxable income) [Charitable donations] {Donations as % of income}
2010 ($21.7 million) [$2.98 million] {13.73%}
2011 ((est) $20.9 million) [$4 million] {19.14%}

Now we know that Rick hasn't made his tax returns available, So we don't know how charitable he's been. But did you know he has had some associations with Charitable foundations and PACS? This is how that all worked out:
In 2001, Santorum created a charitable foundation. This organization, Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, gave out nearly $474,000 to community groups in its first few years. Sounds great, right? The problem is that it had actually raised over a million dollars in that time. The remaining half million dollars was paid out to as salaries and consulting fees to lobbyists and fundraisers connected to Santorum’s campaign. Only 36% of the money raised by the foundation actually made it to those it was designed to help.

Similar discrepancies can be found in a political action committee formed by Santorum. It was supposed to be raising money to help fellow Republican candidates. However, only 18% of the funds went to those candidates. Much of the remaining money was used to furnish Santorum with a lavish lifestyle. Reports also show dozens of trips to fast food joints, supermarkets, Starbucks and other everyday expenses that had little to nothing to do with the original intent of the funds raised.
Please check us out on Facebook and If you like what you see, please "Like" us. You can find us here.

14 comments:

Lionhead said...

Hi Bos, Good Job! Keep going, you're just sinking Mitt further.

In the mean time Rasmussen has just released its latest poll.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/election_2012_republican_presidential_primary

National GOP: Santorum 39%, Romney 27%, Gingrich 15%, Paul 10%

Blowback!

BOSMAN said...

We'll see LH!

Better start lining up your next ABR...because Santorum is going nowhere. He'll MELT just like the other flavors, only maybe a little faster.

leighrow said...

Why isn't this being reported in the main stream media and FOX news? I new all about this because my family who still lives in Pennsylvania told me about this big fact.

Again there is a BIG reason why Sanotrum lost by 18% in Pennsylvania as an incumbent Senator in 2006. I guess the MSM and FOX are going to report these type of details to the GOP primary voters after Santorum gets nominated.

Anonymous said...

I agree, why hasn't anyone brought this up.

This is the definition of cronyism!

Teemu said...

No, this is definition of scam/fraud.

Pretty hilarious how LH was jumping on board with the silly "Blood money" allegations, when if you looked into it, it was obvious that a weekly board of directors job of 2-4 hours of doing board of directors stuff for that company doesn't enable you to know every technical detail of the industry and the company.

Now that we have a obvious scam here, it's just unfair attacks.

Publius Nemo said...

One thing is certain. Santorum entered office with average means and he left with big contracts and paydays. Nothing illegal but just what has become commonplace for Washington insiders. Service = Gain. That's why we want someone from the private sector this time. It's high time!

Terrye said...

Lionhead...Why does it sink Mitt to talk about Santorum's finances? No one is lying about him..if it is the truth..why not talk about it? Are you afraid to deal openly with Santorum's finances.

dgenetaylor said...

The truth is what its all about. What I want to hear is the truth. its not "negative" if its true. If its a lie, then counter with facts.

Anonymous said...

Great post Bos.

Santorum is the great pretender.

Anonymous said...

You failed to mention the $4000 worth of used clothing and household items he claimed as charity donations!! In 2007, the Santorums took a $4,000 charity deduction for giving away "clothing, footwear, accessories and household items."

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2012/02/15/santorums_tax_returns_show_steady_rise_in_wealth/

executive gifts said...

The donation rates are hilarious. While Obama and Biden were relatively obscure before running for President and VP they gave like $1.29 per year to charity ( I exaggerate only a little for a joke). Sarah Palin gave much higher percent than both before presidential race. Both Obama and Biden gave practically nothing.

Geoff Granfield said...

For the duration of tax filing a taxpayer will surely have to make some difficult decisions, just like whether or not to file personally using the paper form or internet application, or using a tax expert. To many this seems pointless on the other hand, the choice could cause how big or little your tax return will probably be, whether or not you owe the Internal Revenue Service or otherwise, Know pluses and minuses to each choice today. http://www.tax-defense-network-tax-tips.com/tax-return/

Stew said...

We are all aware the taxes in California and Illinois tend to be ridiculous, subsequently with the intention to continue to keep total tax rates from climbing, it appears to be there's a competition involving the pair on who will make the extremely hilarious (although, not really amusing to taxpayers of these states) tax policies. And that is the way in which obtain a candy tax! The only real reasonable method to make up the revenue would be to implement a candies tax. Quite serious these types of states have implemented a sales tax on particular kind of sweets that "have no vitamins and minerals." See where your preferred candy stands here: http://www.tax-defense-network-tax-laws.com/tax-defense-network-fruits-candy-blueberry-taxed/

Sharon said...

Just recently, Romney planned something that would surely affect a lot of American citizens. He wanted to increase the taxes of low-income family while those who are earning more would get a series of tax cuts. I don't really understand the logic, but I'm pretty sure that if that thing happens, more and more people will experience additional burdens. irs form 2290