Sunday, October 31, 2010

Sarah Palin: “I don’t need to run for office”

That's what she told Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday yesterday and added,

“I know that I don’t need a title. In fact, I love the freedom that I have that I can sit here and I can tell you anything I want to tell you and not have to worry so much how it will affect my future political career.”

“I love the position that I’m in now. I would weigh that, the freedom that I have now, against those constraints you would have as a candidate.”

Here is the full interview:

Part 1: (Palin starts at the 8:40 minute mark)


Part 2: ("I don't need to run......" starts at 2:40 minute mark)


You tell em, Sarah. I agree with you that some of the media are "corrupt bastards" and more importantly, YOU DON'T NEED TO RUN!

9 comments:

Right Wingnut said...

She's basically, saying that if the crop of likely candidates stays the same, she would run. If she's happy with Mitt, why would she even consider it? Everyone knows he's running.

Anonymous said...

Sarah, 70% of America agree!

zeke

Anonymous said...

Right Wingnut,

"She's basically, saying that if the crop of likely candidates stays the same, she would run. If she's happy with Mitt, why would she even consider it? Everyone knows he's running."

................

Because she's smart enough to know, that until he declares he's a candidate, he's not.

Why would she want to declare support for someone until they officially declare? What would she gain from that?

zeke

Tracey said...

Soft ball interview in my opinion. Why didn't Chris play the clip from her TLC show... "I would rather be here than in some stuffy ole political office. I like being free." How can anyone say that and then expect to win the "stuffy ole Oval Office." Now that is a fish bowl. Why would she want to be there?

Rove said she is not acting like a candidate for POTUS. She shot back but like him or hate him, he is the architect and he knows what it takes to when a general election. She can't win a general. She is officially damaged goods.

Anonymous said...

I'll bet she doesn't run and that she becomes Romney's biggest supporter. Sorry Mike.

cindy

tracey said...

Rove said she is not acting like a candidate for POTUS. She shot back but like him or hate him, he is the architect and he knows what it takes to win a general election. She can't win a general. She is officially damaged goods.

Bill589 said...

Sarah Palin has been leading the fight for our liberty, safety, and fiscal health for the past two years. (Who has the Left been fighting off, and right in front of us. Not ‘behind the scenes.’) She’s been first out front numerous times. (Definition of leading.) I think 2012 will just make it official.

Maybe she’ll hire Mitt to take care of the economy. He may be the best pick for that, but she’s the natural leader.

Bill589 said...

To me, if the country was one humongous, complicated, mixed up super-corporation, Mitt might be the best person to fix it. But it’s not just that. We’re at war first within the country.

Socialism is not something we need to do even more compromising with. Look what it gave us so far. Besides the giant, expensive government with corruption high and low, our kids and grandkids have debt for what we have squandered. “It is a sin for any generation to borrow more than it can pay back in that generation.” - (one of the Founders)

Palin has shown that she has the cojones others claim to have. She can hire the best people for the economy, defense, etc. She has the right goals and the fortitude to bring us there.

"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - T. Paine

Let’s do the hard work, for our grandkids' sake.

Anonymous said...

Joe Scarborough said that a conservative republican told him that Sarah Palin represents "an anti intellectual strain within the party that will destroy us with the educated voter."

Palin could get the nomination but she will never win in the general election against Obama.