Just don’t call it that.
One of the consequences of the Hamas atrocities of October 7, 2023, was this: they reminded native Europeans that a good many of the millions of Muslims who live in their countries are not necessarily the friendly bearers of cultural enrichment that politicians claim them to be. After Gazans massacred Israelis on such a terrifying scale, native Europeans were compelled to recognize that the same thing could happen – tomorrow morning – on their own turf. Little wonder that anti-immigration parties have won more support.
And nowhere in Europe, perhaps, has awareness of the danger of mass immigration spiked more than in Britain. A handful of brave souls have been talking about the Muslim rape gangs for years, but even now precious few of the perpetrators have been brought to justice. A not inconsiderable percentage of Muslims in Britain admit to pollsters that they’d like to see the country subjected to sharia law. A long list of major British cities have Muslim mayors. Even as native Brits struggle to find decent, affordable housing, the government is putting Muslim illegals up in luxury hotels.
Those who dare to complain publicly about any of these things risk arrest and prosecution. Indeed, while people are allowed to march in the streets waving Hamas flags, displaying the Union Jack or the St. George’s cross – the flag of England – is treated as a crime. For years, both the Conservatives and Labourites have repeatedly promised to reduce immigration and repeatedly broken their promises. Reform UK, the party whose electoral fortunes have skyrocketed as a result, seems too timid to do what’s necessary to rescue the UK from full Islamization.
Perfect timing, then, for an article in the Guardian arguing that Britain, and indeed all of Europe, needs to increase immigration levels. “Those wanting to shut Europe’s borders,” avers the British journalist Alex Clark, “must contend with a stark demographic reality: the continent’s native population is expected to fall sharply over the next century in an era of low birth rates.” So if anti-immigration parties take control in Europe and actually succeed in reducing immigration rates, it “could speed up the population decline of Europe, creating economic shocks including slower growth and soaring costs from pensions and elderly care.”
Clark (not to be confused with a conservative American commentator of the same name) approvingly quotes John Springford of the Centre for European Reform, a pro-EU think tank, who approvingly notes that mainstream politicians “recognise that immigration is needed to ease demographic pressures” but are being challenged by the “radical right.” What a way to put it. In fact most Europeans oppose mass immigration, especially from the Islamic world, and have been opposed to it for a long time. The problem is that the politicians who are supposed to represent their interests have utterly ignored their wishes and have allowed the flow of immigrants to continue unabated.
Those politicians, and “experts” like Springford who stand up for them, would have you believe that mass immigration is really in the best interests of the people of Europe, whether those foolish ignoramuses realize it or not. They point out that a large cohort of the European population will soon reach retirement age, and will require more medical services and, perhaps, placement in old-age homes, and that the continent will need more doctors and nurses to provide that care, not to mention more working-age people whose taxes will fund that care. Absent mass immigration, goes the argument, the tax burden on working-age Europeans will rise appreciably. “Tax burdens are already rising across Europe,” warns Clark. Yes, and a major reason why they’re rising is that a disproportionate number of the Muslims who have flooded Europe during the last couple of generations, far from being added to the work force, have been added to the welfare rolls. --->READ MORE HERE
UK’s Rapid Islamization: The Silent Transformation Unfolding:
No comments:
Post a Comment