In addition to costing taxpayers $6 trillion, President Joe Biden’s 2022 budget proposal insults women all across the country by replacing the term “mother” with “birthing people.”
“The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate among developed nations, with an unacceptably high mortality rate for Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and other women of color,” according to the budget plan. After using the terms “maternal” and “women of color,” the plan suddenly switches to gender-neutral terminology.
Biden’s proposal seeks over $200 million in funding “to help end this high rate of maternal mortality and race-based disparities in outcomes among birthing people.”
The phrase “birthing people” previously drew controversy in May when it was used during a House Oversight Committee hearing on black maternal health. Some Twitter respondents argued the term reduced women to nothing more than baby-makers. Others questioned if Mother’s Day will soon no longer exist. --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| Photo: Dougal Waters/Getty Images |
Joe Biden ran on an absurdly radical platform for a “moderate,” but it looks like he saved a lot of his truly crazy ideas for the White House. Just when Americans think his policies can’t get any more deranged, he unleashes a budget that cancels moms.
In a bizarre attempt to transgender the English language, Biden has decided to bleep out the word “mother” and replace it with “birthing people”—a demeaning term that reduces women to some sort of utilitarian breeding center in another effort to eradicate gender. And yet, when Biden’s wokest leaders have been asked to explain the change, they can’t or won’t.
In Wednesday’s Senate committee meeting, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra struggled to field questions on why the word “mom” is being treated like the world’s newest profanity. When Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., pressed him, “Can you help me get a good definition of ‘birthing people?'” the secretary fumbled awkwardly for an answer.
“I’ll check on the language there,” Becerra replied, “but I think if we’re talking about those who give birth, I think we’re talking about—” he paused. “I don’t know how else to explain it to—” he trailed off clumsily.
“I was a little taken aback when I read it,” Lankford said. He asked, what’s the point of the shift? Will there be regulations to go along with it? Becerra told him again that he’d have to “go back and take a look.” --->READ MORE HEREFollow links below to related stories:
+++++Biden uses ‘birthing people’ in budget, accused of wanting to ‘cancel mothers’+++++
GOP senator grills Biden HHS secretary on ‘birthing people,’ suggests using ‘Mom’ instead
GOP Senator Confronts HHS Secretary on ‘Birthing People’ Phrase: ‘Mom Is a Pretty Good Word’
Biden OMB Doubles Down on Redefining Mothers as ‘Birthing People’ in Budget Proposal
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment