Saturday, June 21, 2014

Mitt Romney crushes 2016 Hopefuls in a new NH Poll

hahahaha ..I'm not surprized:
With a suddenly hot brand and a public turning on his old foe, former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is a surprise front-runner in New Hampshire over a 2016 GOP field struggling to catch fire with voters, a new Suffolk University/Boston Herald poll reveals.
“I think the poll looks like a lot of what the party feels right now across the country. There’s a great reservoir of affection for the governor,” said Ron Kaufman, a longtime Romney adviser who said he talked with the former Massachusetts governor recently about the 2016 race.
Romney, who has stirred speculation about another White House run with a series of high-profile media interviews, gets the backing of 24 percent of likely GOP primary voters in a test matchup in New Hampshire. None of the possible Republican contenders even cracks double digits with Romney in the mix, according to the Suffolk/Herald poll.
Romney’s closest competitor is New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who manages 9 percent, the poll shows.
Without Romney in the field, the GOP presidential contest in the first-in-the-nation primary state looks murky. Christie and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul are tied at the top with just 11 percent support among 419 likely primary voters. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz are next with 8 percent of the vote. Nearly one-third of Republican voters are undecided.
Romney’s ascension comes as voters grow increasingly negative about his 2012 rival, President Obama, whose approval rating has tumbled to an all-time low in New Hampshire. Just 39 percent of Granite State voters give a thumbs-up to Obama’s job performance, while 52 percent disapprove, according to the poll.
Read the rest of the story HERE.

I'll bet, but I'm not 100% positive, that ALL THE POLLS that have included Romney in the 2016 mix (and there haven't been that many that have), He comes in on top by a large margin. Just Guessing.

I do have to wonder though, how many of the OBAMA ENABLERS .. Those that voted for comrade O'Dumbo, voted 3rd party, or STAYED HOME ON THEIR ASS (ALL 3 the same), would do it differently if they could hop in a wayback machine and do it all over again? .. or .. Perhaps their stupidity is terminal?

Say something NICE!

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.


11 comments:

Republic of Texas TV said...

So - if I voted my conscience, I would be an "enabler"? Guess what, chump, I'll be doing the same in 2016, so get over yourself. Wave the flag for Romney while we all LAUGH at you, it's RINO season and Mittens ain't got a chance.

Anonymous said...

I've been thinking about this recently. What kind of fool would sit out 2012? It boggles my mind. That truly is a special kind of stupid.

I remember the way I felt the days and weeks after the loss. It was a recognition and resignation that all was lost. Now we know why we felt that way!

Obama has basically destroyed the rule of law. I don't know if we can recover, he's broken so much terrible new ground.

Many Republicans still want Romney, and for good reason. No one else comes close. But is America still too dense to do the right thing?

-Martha

Anonymous said...


__________________________

Gov. Mitt Romney:

In this country

we want someone
who can

help other people
become successful


__________________________

Anonymous said...


__________________________

Gov. Mitt Romney:

In this country

we want someone
who can

help other people
become successful


__________________________

A Texas Conservative said...

Romney wasn't my first or second choice during the primaries. When he won the nomination, I thought about sitting out the final.

After thinking about it I realized that I agreed with Romney a hell of a lot more than Obama, who I didn't agree with at all.

In the end, I voted Romney and now I'm glad I did.

Joel2014 said...

It appears some conservatives understand the logic of why voting for our candidate is so important despite reservations while others choose to remain clueless of the long term damage of their illogical actions. No conservative in their right mind would ever state that they agreed more with the incumbents political views than those our past candidates views and if they did they would be in denial. Hence, it comes down to this, selfishness. These so-called true conservatives were unwilling to look beyond their own biases and vote for the good of the nation as a whole, choosing instead to sit out this past election cycle. Call it anything you want, justify it however you want to, but in the end it comes down to one thing, selfishness. The harsh reality? They loved themselves more than their country.

RomneyMan said...

"I've been thinking about this recently. What kind of fool would sit out 2012?"

You'd be surprised, I bet there were certain types of people who wouldn't vote out of petty bitterness. You know, the same type who, say in 2008, threw their toys out and not only didn't vote, but voted for OB, due to their beloved getting beat handily by McCain in the primaries (and not picking their beloved as their running mate). You know, perhaps then using the 'excuse' they they are from OR and their vote would make little difference in a general.
Those types you mean?

Anonymous said...

________________________________________
Mitt's Moment

He fixes problems; we've got 'em.
________________________________________

Mr. Romney never really fit his assigned part
as Gordon Gekko or Milburn Drysdale.
When other private equity pioneers were
turning their millions into billions,
he left to rescue the Winter Olympics.

America is not headed in 2012 for
a landmark decision on the size and
role of government. America is headed
only for a moment of recognition.
Like Greece.
Like the troubled businesses Bain overhauled.
Like the failing Salt Lake City Olympics.

There's no money to pay for bigger
and bigger government.
There's no money to pay for the government
we've already promised ourselves.

Bankrupting the nation to pay
for health care is not an option.
If we do nothing, if entitlements remain unreformed,
the money simply will be withheld to pay for them.
You'll still be entitled to that knee operation
at taxpayer expense. Good luck finding a doctor
to perform it. The WAITING list will be long.

Our world that's coming is a world of narrowing,
not widening, choices. It's a world that suits
Mr. Romney's skills and history,
his knack for operating within constraints.

Mr. Obama lives in the same world, of course,
but is unequipped to deal with it. Also, given
his inclination to seek refuge in a clueless reverie
of big new programs
at a time when the resources simply don't exist.

The consensus for painful reform comes
when the status quo hits the wall.
It's a myth that we don't know what our choices are.

That's the Romney moment. His strong suit has
always been to do what everyone else has put off.

________________________________________

Wall Street Journal December 2011

Anonymous said...

RM-as predictable as the sun rising in the east and still unable to grasp simple concepts. You poor kid.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

Martha, RM just can't see the forest for the trees, now can he/she/it? it baffles me and others here how that person can chew gum at the same time as sniffing up his boogers. Over and over, Romney is proven to be right. this 'rino' hunting crap is just that... CRAP. Most of those conservatives who are called 'rinos' have WON their primary's. The baggers win 2, and suddenly they are a force to be reconciled with? and I should not have to point out that in at least one of those elections, it was an open primary, where demo's voted to oust the GOP incumbent and put someone totally beatable in. Call me a 'rino' if you must. But at least MY brain cells are in the 'on' mode, and I'm not just chanting the Levine/palin/lee/cruzie crap. I know math is hard for some in our party, but Romney won by the MOST VOTES. you know, actual people going to a ballot box and casting a actual ballot.

Anonymous said...

While a 3rd run may seem improbable... Romney may well be the best candidate we have.

He is one of the best candidates to run in many many years.

He runs again, he will have my vote !