Thursday, August 29, 2013

Should Websites do away with Anonymous Comments?

PERHAPS SICK of being the poster boy for Godwin’s Law, the Huffington Post plans to ban anonymous commenting. Beginning next month, users will have to register their identities before they comment, declares founder and editor-in-chief Arianna Huffington, ending a long tradition (in Internet time, that means eight years) of unfettered reader participation. 
It’s not an unexpected decision, but it comes with much cost. Discussions will be less robust, some information that should be made public will remain hidden, and the enemies of free speech will be handed an easy victory by those who should be its defenders.
[...] 
...Internet did not invent anonymous commentary. The Federalist Papers, for example, were originally published under the pseudonym of “Publius.” Would Huffington have denied their authors — founding fathers Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison — the right to make their arguments? One hopes not, and for good reason. Anonymity helps expose truth. It also gives some measure of power to the weak and the marginalized. 
It is those who are on the inside of something, be it government, a corporation, or an institution, who are best positioned to know about wrongdoing. But many are reluctant or unable to bear the personal consequences of that exposure — retribution, humiliation, legal threats, job losses — and so they tell their stories without revealing their names. Reporters realize there are risks to this, including a heightened possibility a source may be lying. But still, some of the biggest stories in journalism were broken using anonymous sources. Remember Watergate and Deep Throat?
And even when it comes to everyday commentary, requiring registration means that fewer will participate and that those who do will guard their words. A victim of rape might want to describe her own experiences in response to a story on sexual harassment but, knowing that somewhere her personal information is attached to her comment, she’ll demur....
Read the full story HERE.

I think many people who comment on sites start out by making anonymous comments and as their confidence in their opinion increases, many eventually do end up with a name or handle.

I'm not for restricting free speech in any shape or form. Even from those who choose to keep their identity secret....

hahahaha...although with the software that's available now to owners of websites.. Anonymous people may not be as anonymous as they think.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.


10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I've tried to comment at HuffPo,it was a no go. I used my real name, they just didn't like what I had to say. And I WAS POLITE in saying it.

Ohio JOE said...

Haha.

Anonymous said...

I would not comment anywhere ever if I could not do so anonymously. I don't care if Bosman knows who I am though. :-)

-Martha

Joel2013 said...

No need to disallow anonymous posts, not that big a deal in my opinion.

RomneyMan said...

*Anonymous* should always be allowed- cowards cannot be made to tag a name to their *principles*.

Anonymous said...

I am the only person that I have ever found with my name, so yeah, I would rather be anon.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

It is higher communication to talk about ideas, rather than attacking people.

CRUZ COUNTRY said...

It seems that some of you are misinterpreting the article's use of the term "anonymous".

It's NOT about your screen name.

It's about your registration information which reveals your TRUE IDENTITY to the website owner.

Currently, most websites do NOT require you to reveal your true identity to the website owner in order to comment, although that is somewhat compromised by the "software" Bosman alluded to.

Any website that implements this new registration requirement that the article refers to will see its readership and comment numbers SEVERELY PLUMMET, especially among those who make politically incorrect comments like myself.

Anonymous said...

"Person of Interest" is a good TV series to follow. Nothing is perfectly anonymous now, as Snowden explained and proved

Since people have used my moniker, and pretended to be me, I personally see being "anonymous" as potentially less contentious. People should be able to protect their jobs. We are suppose to have freedom of speech.

Anonymous said...

But we don't. There are so many who only want freedom for themselves.