Thursday, January 10, 2013

Orly Taitz claims of Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full U.S. Supreme Court.

H/T Chris Macy

Just last week Attorney Orly Taitz was in a courtroom presenting her evidence to the deaf ears of U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England who after hearing her claims said:
"Your argument, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever," the judge told her at one point. 
In the end, England rejected her request for a temporary restraining order that would stop the tally of electoral college votes and deny Obama a second term.
The judge finally told her, "There is absolutely no way that this case will survive the challenge it faces,"

Hahahaha....Judge....NOT SO FAST!

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
Read the rest of the story HERE.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.


newark hawk said...

Well, I guess this means that Chief Justice Roberts is a "birther".

Who knew?!?!?


newark hawk said...

Governor Romney better start warming up in the bullpen. His number may soon be called.

newark hawk said...

The conference is scheduled for February 15th.

If 4 of the 9 Justices agree to a FULL hearing of the case, it will go forward.

At a full hearing, 5 of the 9 Justices must side with the plaintiff for the President - and a lot of other people - to be in BIG TROUBLE.

As Obama appointees, Justices Sotomayer and Kagan have an obvious conflict of interest and should recuse themselves, leaving the 7 remaining Justices to hear and decide this case.

newark hawk said...

Ms. Taitz was one of the very first attorneys to pursue Obama's eligibility in the courts, starting in the summer of 2008.

She knows what she's doing, and is totally committed to removing the USURPER-IN-CHIEF from the Oval Office.

She is a true patriot, a true hero, a true profile in courage.

Anonymous said...

Can this be true?

newark hawk said...

Don't expect our state-run media - including Fox & talk radio - to cover this story, despite its monumental importance.

They can't, with a straight face, call John Roberts a "birther", so there's no way for them to spin this story in favor of Obama and the Dems.

Since they can't spin it, they will bury it, just like they've buried it for the last 5 years, except for the occasional "birther" slur.

newark hawk said...

When Justice Roberts ruled in favor of ObamaCare last summer, perhaps he did so with this eligibility case in mind.

Having clearly established himself as a nonpartisan Justice, he can now uphold Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution without fear of being called a right-wing nut by our state-run media.

Stranger things have happened.

BOSMAN said...

Newark Hawk,

Any interest in being a contributor at RS?

No pressure, Just post when you feel like it.

Also, if you belong to Facebook, check out 'U.S. General Elections Central'. It's a new group with over 2000 members already.

BOSMAN said...


The link to the group is the new tab under the Right Speak Heading.

Anonymous said...

Oh, wouldn't this be something! We can dream, anyway.

Newark, you would be a great contributor.


Dumb Plumber said...

So let me get this straight, Mr. Obama can have a forged identity, forged Social Security number and classified records since high school, but if I'm caught with these same documents, I spend a few quality years in Lompoc.

Anonymous said...

We are all still distrustful ... and unfortunately February 15th is after swearing in - imagine the damage while this is being debated.

35 states are on board for constitutional convention - we need three more! This might open the conversation before January 20th!

Anonymous said...

Bosman, went to FB and could not see how to join your discussion?

BOSMAN said...

Anon :01

If you look on the right side of the Group page you should see a join the group link.

newark hawk said...


Thanks a lot for the offer.

Sure, I would love to contribute to RIGHT SPEAK. How do I proceed?

I've been offline since my last comment. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.

newark hawk said...

@ Martha

Thanks, I enjoy reading your posts and comments too.

BOSMAN said...

Newark Hawk,

Email me Here: