A Place for All Conservatives to Speak Their Mind.
This is way off on too many ways to count.-Martha
I totally agree, especially Romney's placing. The makers of this chart can't be this stupid. The depiction has to be politically motivated. I hate it when people lie!!
"First, the area of each candidate’s circle is proportional to their perceived likelihood of winning the nomination, according to the Intrade betting market. Mitt Romney’s circle is drawn many times the size of the one for the relatively obscure talk-radio host Herman Cain because Intrade rates Mr. Romney many times as likely to be nominated."The MONEY is on MITT!
They only thing they got right on this poll was Romney's odds of winning!
Do we really care what Nate Who? thinks these folks should be placed on a graph?
I don't get or agree with the placement of those circles. Was it by lottery?
What makes Pawlenty so much more conservative than Daniels? What makes Huckabee more conservative than Pawlenty? Or Gingrich more conservative than Barbour? This looks like he made the background for the chart and then just threw darts with the candidates' names at it.
TC has resorted to posting NY Times articles and we're supposed to care?zeke
Post a Comment