Saturday, October 24, 2026

The Democrats’ Red Takeover: Welcome to Communism

The Democrats’ Red Takeover:
Welcome to communism.
A truly evil cabal has taken control of the Democrats. It took effect when the pact between the Sen. Joe Biden camp and the Sen. Bernie Sanders camp was signed in July 2020. The pact was a 110-page position paper on many national issues of concern to both men. Although Bernie had caucused with Democrats in the Senate for years, he was elected to office in Vermont under the rubric of “Democratic Socialist.” He usually justified that rubric as not being “communist” because he said he was a “non-authoritarian socialist” (sic).
This clever manipulation of language could not, however, hide the reality that his lifelong views were derived from Marxist critiques of capitalism. His bombastic rhetoric was largely taken from the Marxist playbook of criticisms of capitalistic Western culture. And, in fact, when Sen. Sanders married in the 1980s, he and his wife honeymooned in the USSR.
Compare Biden’s willingly uniting with Sanders with Harry Truman’s wing of the Dems that refused to ally itself with the Henry Wallace wing of the Democrats in 1948. Henry Wallace was a tremendous mover and shaker within the Democrat Party, and he not only had served as the Secretary of Agriculture under Pres. Roosevelt, but was the Vice-President handpicked by Roosevelt, who served as V.P. during most of WWII. However, his obsessive insistence on having greater sympathy for and alliance with Josef Stalin and the communist rule of the USSR created considerable disgust and suspicion among the Democrat party leadership, and FDR replaced Henry Wallace with Harry S. Truman as his V.P. in the election of 1944. FDR won that election and died the next year, and Truman became president of the USA.
Truman did not try to conform with Wallace in 1948 and did not try to “build bridges” with him. Wallace instead ran against Truman as the Progressive Party candidate for president, resurrecting the name of the party from the earlier movements by that name in both the Democrat and Republican Parties in the early 20th century.
Wallace’s use of the term “progressive” was intended to deflect legitimate concerns that he was a communist ideologue. The platform of the Progressive Party had statements that certainly stoked this concern. The platform said, “If peace is to be achieved, capitalist United States and communist Russia must establish good relations and work together.”
Another statement that appeared in the Progressive platform stated, “The move to outlaw the Communist Party is a decisive step in their assault on the democratic rights of labor, of nations, racial, and political minorities.” And lastly, the Democrat decision to rebuild West Germany as a bulwark against communism was distorted to state, “The use of the Marshall Plan to rebuild Nazi Germany [sic] has a war basis … [and is intended] to subjugate the economies of other European countries to American big business.” Thus, our legitimate concerns about the ideological and military expansion of the USSR was distorted by Wallace’s pro-communist vision.
Truman, in a surprise victory, defeated Thomas Dewey, the Republican candidate for president, and Wallace received less than 3% of the votes cast.
Thus, the left-leaning but non-communist mainstream of the Democrats retained their claim to being “liberal” or “left-of-center” and managed to draw the line when it came to uniting with the extreme leftist wing of their party. However, that boundary line collapsed 72 years later with the emergence of the Biden-Sanders pact. The Dems are now the Demo-communist party with a few other elements of cultural Marxism included that were not anticipated by or included in the writings of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels.
For example, Marx and Engels understood the family to be a bourgeois institution that they believed promoted selfishness, so they stood basically in opposition to the nuclear family as the building block of society. However, knowledge of puberty-blockers and genital-mutilating surgeries was not available in the 1840s, so they did not explicitly promote “transitioning” as a legitimate albeit anti-family practice. Today’s left is, of course, totally on board with all this transgender-affirming ideology because it conforms totally with traditional anti-bourgeois, anti-family values. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.


No comments: