Lindsay Clancy Jurors Are Reminiscent Of The Covid Cult; In A Sane Country, Women Would Rally Around Erika Kirk Instead Of Lindsay Clancy

NBC10 BOSTON / YOUTUBE

Lindsay Clancy Jurors Are Reminiscent Of The Covid Cult:

The majority badgered and bullied the holdout juror who didn’t ‘trust the experts’ on the ‘science’ of postpartum psychosis. Sound familiar?

Kellie Farina’s frustration was palpable, her disdain still fresh as she described her unyielding fellow juror. Farina said the man just didn’t get it. Despite all of the evidence (the toxicology report, the “expert” testimony, the “entertaining” defense attorney), he refused to join the 11 jury members who had long before agreed that Lindsay Clancy was not guilty of murdering her three young children. 

The 11 angry men and women on the jury agreed that Clancy was legally insane when she used exercise bands to strangle to death Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — one by one in the Clancy basement. She then attempted to take her own life. But after 40 hours of deliberations, the holdout wouldn’t budge. 

“We read to him on numerous occasions the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge (William) Sullivan’s instruction,” an exasperated Farina told Boston’s NBC 10 this week in an exclusive interview. “He actually said one day in the end, ‘Why don’t we have the judge come in and read it again?’ And we were like, ‘No, we have it in front of us.’”

WOW. The pro-Clancy juror who was angry that the male holdout “couldn’t get over the fact that Lindsay Clancy viciously killed her children” was the pink dress-wearing juror first reported by MAMA Magazine. https://t.co/PrSNRkQGta pic.twitter.com/T5qknzobXS

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 9, 2026

Farina, a senior center chef, flirted with the term “rogue” in describing the unidentified juror. She spoke of how her 10 compatriots would get up during the “hours of frustration” and walk the room “because you couldn’t sit any more.” She said they would inevitably end up at the cart that held the trial exhibits. 

“He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said,” juror Paula Devlin said, aggravated that the intransigent man wouldn’t listen to the nurses on the jury, the “experts” in her mind. 

“We had the toxicology report. We could see exactly the amount.  The nurses in the room … spoke to that very thing,” Devlin, who works for a defense contractor, told the news outlet, referring to the prescription medicine that, the defense argued, combined to drive Clancy into a state of postpartum psychosis. “And he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him.” 

As I watched the women vent their frustrations about a man who couldn’t bring himself to find a mother who murdered her children not guilty by reason of insanity, I flashed back to another time when “progressive” women served as dutiful soldiers for the cult of “experts.” 

The Covid Cult --->READ MORE HERE

ANDREA HANKS/THE WHITE HOUSE/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

In A Sane Country, Women Would Rally Around Erika Kirk Instead Of Lindsay Clancy:

As the country has fallen away from its Christian roots, so too have its people lost focus on what it means to uphold the true, good, and beautiful.

American women far and wide are rallying together to support one of their own. This woman, they say, has suffered immensely and deserves the public’s utmost compassion. According to them, she is both a victim and a shining symbol of bravery and courage in the face of adversity.

The female these women are talking about is not Erika Kirk, the widow of conservative icon Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated one year ago on Thursday. Rather, they’re referring to Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts woman recently on trial for killing her three young children in cold blood.

It all sounds completely ridiculous and downright evil because it is. And yet, that’s the reality we find ourselves living in.

All across the nation, these Real Housewives of TikTok and Clancy truthers are running to Clancy’s defense, demanding that she be declared innocent for a horrendous crime she doesn’t deny. They tell us that she is the real victim; that it’s actually her husband’s fault; and a host of other excuses needed to convince themselves that the woman with blood on her hands deserves to walk free.

And if you thought this diseased mentality wouldn’t find its way into our justice system, think again.

Since the case was declared a mistrial due to disagreement among the jury, three Clancy jurors — all middle-aged white women — have come forward to tell their side of the story on camera. And wouldn’t you know that one of their main objectives has been to attack the lone juror (a man) who reportedly refused to let Clancy off for her evil acts.

One of these jurors was blunt in effectively conceding that it really didn’t matter to her and the others prepared to give Clancy a pass that Clancy didn’t deny strangling her kids. Referring to the holdout juror, she said, “He had the hardest time getting over the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”

Don’t sweat it, folks! It’s just three innocent lives taken too soon. No biggie!

These women are trying to make it out to be about society needing to have “compassion” and “empathy” for supposedly “struggling” females like Clancy. But if that’s what it’s really about, then where were these same women — who want us to empathize with a known killer in the name of “womanhood” — when a woman like Erika Kirk was turned into a widow because a left-wing radical took her husband’s life? --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.