RIGHT SPEAK: Dems Show Just How Low They Can Go In Latest Ballot Schemes: Democrats Once Again Tried to Keep Competition Off the Ballot in Wisconsin, and Worked an Identity Scam in Alaska

Dems Show Just How Low They Can Go In Latest Ballot Schemes:

Democrats once again tried to keep competition of the ballot in Wisconsin, and worked an identity scam in Alaska

Two recent ballot battles more than 3,400 miles apart tell you all you need to know about just how nasty Democrats play for power.
In one case, Democrats enlisted the assistance of a Milwaukee law firm in a failed attempt to take out Green Party competition — a familiar play from the left’s political playbook. In another, liberals in Alaska appear to be behind a shady scheme to run a convenient “Republican” named Dan Sullivan against incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan in Alaska’s August GOP Senate primary.

Handsome former First Lady Michelle Obama liked to unironically say of Democrats, “When they go low, we go high.” In Alaska, Wisconsin and across the nation, the question increasingly is, “How low can Democrats go?”

It’s Not Easy Being Green

Earlier this month, Pete Karas became the latest Green Party candidate to face the political grist mill of Democrats. Karas, running for the mostly ceremonial post of Wisconsin secretary of state, was forced to fight a frivolous challenge to all of his nearly 3,000 signatures on his petition for candidacy.

Gregory Walz-Chojnacki, affiliated with the state Democrats but not running for the statewide position, asked the Wisconsin Elections Commission to toss out the 2,937 signatures, significantly more than the 2,000 state law requires. Walz-Chojnacki made two spurious claims to justify his challenge: that Karas’ signature collectors may have lived out of state, and that dozens of the pages were blurry.

Karas and his Madison attorney, Skylar Croy, presented evidence that all circulators under penalty of law, stated on the forms that they resided in Wisconsin and noted their addresses. As to Walz-Chojnacki’s claims that the submitted forms were “blurry,” the challenger in his complaint did not specify what pages he had difficulty reading, according to a press release on behalf of Karas. Besides, as the Green Party candidate notes, flawless nomination papers are not required under state law, only “substantial compliance.” A state appeals court upheld the standard in a lawsuit questioning the validity of papers with blurry, obscured, or missing words.

And, according to Karas, Walz-Chojnacki failed to have his complaint notarized.

‘It’s Their Strategy’

The challenge quickly died. Walz-Chojnacki’s liberal Milwaukee attorney Stacie Rosenzweig notified the Wisconsin Elections Commission shortly after Karas responded to the charges that her client was dropping the challenge. Rosenzweig represented far-left Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Jill Karofsky in a judicial complaint calling out Karofsky’s despicable partisan language from the bench. The justice in 2020 excoriated President Donald Trump’s attorney, Madison attorney Jim Troupis, for defending his client in a campaign challenge to the rigged 2020 presidential election.

“What you want is you want us to overturn this election so that your king can stay in power,” Karofsky said. “And that is so un-American. And for you to say that anyone in Wisconsin engaged in fraud, for you to perpetuate that fallacy on the people of Wisconsin and the people of the United States in America, in what has been called the most significant election in our lifetime, is nothing short of shameful.”

The the Wisconsin Judicial Commission dismissed the complaint but warned Karofsky to “remain neutral and avoid making sarcastic remarks from the bench,” CBS News reported at the time.

In a press release celebrating his victory in an unnecessary fight, Karas said the faulty challenge was just the latest in a long line of Democrats trying to knock the liberal competition off the ballot.

“Democrats love to talk about protecting democracy. Then they hire lawyers to make sure you can’t vote for anyone but them. It’s their strategy,” the press release charged.

In 2024, the Democratic National Committee unsuccessfully attempted to boot Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein off the ballot. They did the same in 2020, but succeeded in keeping Green Party presidential candidate Howie Hawkins out of the race — a process that was widely condemned as a shameless, anti-democratic stunt.

“It’s a partisan thing. It has nothing to do with democracy,” Karas told me during a recent interview on The Vicki McKenna Show. “The Democrats are great at challenging Republicans and saying you’re preventing all of these people from voting, but really what the Democrats are doing is preventing people from having a choice to vote for somebody other than themselves.”

The Battle of the Dans --->READ MORE HERE