Listen to the terrorists. They’ll tell you why they’re doing it.
Most Islamic terrorist attacks start out as mysteries and end up as unsolvable enigmas that are put down to mental illness, random circumstances or the phases of the moon. But sometimes an Islamic terrorist inconveniently explains in great detail exactly what he did and why he did it.Last summer the Dublin pub owned by Conor McGregor, an MMA fighter and vocal critic of Islamic mass migration to Ireland, caught on fire. Despite a previous firebombing, the media initially blamed “an electrical fault” even though the terrorist later told police that when he went to the pub and poured gasoline on the door and windows before setting it on fire, he didn’t hide.
“On Friday, I went to the Black Forge and I set it on fire. My face should be on the tape.”
Friday is the Muslim holy day of the week which just means more pub burnings than usual.
But it’s easy to confuse an unmarked man setting fire to a pub with an electrical fault or mental illness when the perpetrator is a Muslim terrorist. So he decided to make his position clearer.
The electrical fault then took the form of stabbing a Garda, a police officer, with a knife while shouting “Allahu Akbar”. Since the usage of the phrase is often seen as mysterious by the media, the stabber and arsonist who goes by the typical Celtic moniker of Abdullah Khan, helpfully explained that he was shouting “Allahu Akbar” to clarify that he was a terrorist.
“Khan also admitted that him shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ as he attacked the garda was part of his terrorism. ‘I totally agree,’ he said, adding ‘that is undeniable, Allahu Akbar, that doesn’t come out at random’”. No it doesn’t. But you can’t tell that to the authorities or the media who are convinced that “Allahu Akbar” is just something you randomly shout unrelated to the stabbing.
Those same authorities also insist that ISIS, or the Islamic State, and Islamic terrorism have nothing whatsoever to do with Islam, which is a bit like arguing that the British government has nothing to do with Britain, and the Anglican Church has nothing to do with England or churches. On second thought you can see why this line of thought makes perfect sense to the authorities.
But while the pope may not be Catholic, Islamic terrorism is as Islamic as public beheadings.
“I support them, I have always been a spiritual person,” Khan told the police, explaining why he backed ISIS, set a pub on fire and stabbed a police officer. While being a ‘spiritual person’ in more progressive circles may involve exploring auras and going vegan, in Islamic circles, it involves acts of violence with perhaps a side order of rape to establish Allah’s authority.
Khan was filled with wrath over ‘people with a right-wing mindset’ insulting his spiritual religion’s prototypical warlord, killer and paedophile. “When it comes to Prophet Muhammad, we don’t see it as a matter of freedom of speech,” Pakistan’s latest gift to Ireland explained. “I felt the prophet Muhammed had been insulted by people with a right-wing mindset and the State allowed this to happen as free speech”.
In the modern multicultural utopia that has Khans with sensitive spirits and sharpened knives roaming about the old stomping grounds of Joyce, Beckett, and Swift (whose wildest satire couldn’t have envisioned this dystopia), free speech and religious criticism is a “right-wing mindset” while foreign barbarians trying to impose theocracy with the sharp end is progressive. --->READ MORE HERE


No comments:
Post a Comment