Disturbed morons with blood on their hands.
Have you ever “taken to the streets” over any issue? Marched in a protest? Chanted whatever some weirdo ordered you to repeat? Maybe, but probably not. The only protests or marches I’ve ever attended were one against war a friend wanted to go to and he didn’t want to drive to DC alone (plus, I’d never been to DC at that point), one I got extra credit for in college involving newspaper strike, and one that was an annual even to “protest” pot laws because we went to meet chicks and get stoned in a crowd – mostly the novelty of it (which is now common).
In other words, I don’t protest; I’d rather “do.” Protesting is stupid and a waste of time. Nothing has ever happened because a group of morons chanted and drum circled.
But marching, chanting and screaming at anyone who isn’t them is pretty much all Democrats do. Well, that and lie.
How many people’s minds have been changed by blocking traffic? Zero. How many political victories have been racked up by screaming at police? Zero. How many votes have been switched by smashing windows and looting? Zero.
Yet, Democrats do all of these things – not only regularly, but as a default position. The call goes out, the signs are printed (who paid for those?) and the drone army shows up. Many of them have no idea what they’re there to protest or how to pronounce the name of the person they’re instructed to declare having been the subject or perpetrator of the “injustice” that brought them there.
It’s often the generic police or white people, a lot of times it’s Jews. It is never, ever the murder of a police officer, a white person or a Jew, no matter how horrific and unjust the circumstance of their deaths were. Not one Democrat marched for justice for Laken Riley or Iryna Zarutska because they were white and the people who murdered them were non-white, or “people of color,” as they like to proclaim like it matters.
Well, it does matter to Democrats. “Justice,” according to them, is more about skin color than actions and consequences for it. It’s about what happened centuries ago and how that somehow impacts today.
But it’s really only about some – a very small part – of what happened hundreds of years ago and only to certain people. Slavery was horrible, but it was not unique to black people. It was perpetrated by black people as much as it was ever by white people. The whole slave trade in Africa was invented and run by black people, and every configuration of human beings were both victims and perps over history. --->READ MORE HERE
Leftist feminists searching for meaning.
The majority of anti-ICE activists are women, some young but many of them middle-aged. They’ve been called suburban moms, wine moms, and soccer moms. Many are affluent and drive shiny, boxy SUVs. These liberal women often have their small children in their vehicles; some even use the children as shields.
The Advocate, an LGBTQ magazine noted for its celebration of everything left-wing, ran the following headline: “Affluent white women are among the biggest ICE opponents.” The article went on to state that a week after an agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) fatally shot a Minneapolis woman, a poll revealed that “half of American women are in favor of abolishing the law enforcement agency.”
The newsmagazine tied ICE agents’ purported history of violence against men, women, and transgender people in detention facilities, to President Donald Trump referring to some women reporters as “piggy” and “ugly.”
The rhetoric climbed to a higher pitch when the magazine reported, “They also come at a time when reproductive rights and access to gender-affirming care have been significantly restricted and as funding for gender-based violence services and research centering women and LGBTQ+ people has been stripped.” Appeal to your audience, as they say.
The poll the magazine referenced sounds about right, especially when you examine current headlines about ICE protesters or watch news videos of them confronting ICE agents. Very often the first thing you see is a screaming white woman blowing a whistle or obstructing ICE officers.
Women clearly dominate the news when it comes to waging war on ICE.
Some headlines:
Mother Jones, early January 2026: “The women were seemingly attempting to interrupt immigration agents by taking up road space.”
ABC7 Chicago, November 2025: “Group of 14 ‘suburban moms’ among 16 arrested during protests outside Broadview ICE facility.”
CNN, November 2025: “How White Suburban moms are standing up to Border Patrol.”
An Instagram post, December 2025: “A federal agent was recorded dragging a woman across the street.”
Some suburban moms bring their children to ICE protests to act as protective shields: “ICE won’t come near me if they see my twin toddlers. I’ll be able to block their vehicles any way I choose.”
As one Instagram post stated, “Children were sprayed with pepper spray by an immigration enforcement official.”
I grew up on the edges of Philadelphia’s Main Line, near the leafy enclaves of Bryn Mawr, Rosemont, Gladwyne, and Villanova, an area once noted for its debutante balls, Social Register class. One thinks of the palatial 14-acre estate of Hope Montgomery Scott, Ardrossan, that inspired the 1940 film, The Philadelphia Story, starring Katharine Hepburn — where most women voted Republican, volunteered for the Devon Horse Show, or led food and charity drives for the disadvantaged.
These women had a certain class and charm. They were the “Main Line ladies” who would go food shopping in blue jeans and mink stoles. While at times their emphasis on family lineage and “breeding” was overdone — it was a highly exclusive world — this changed when feminism and Philadelphia city Democrat politics — the so-called “rot” from the city — began to slowly saturate these suburban communities.--->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment