RIGHT SPEAK: Clintons Would Rather Go To Prison Than Testify About Epstein; Powerful House Republican Will Hold Clintons to Account After They Skip Epstein Depositions; Chairman Comer: Bill and Hillary Clinton Are Not Above the Law

Clintons Would Rather Go To Prison Than Testify About Epstein:

"Every person has to decide when have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country,"

Bill and Hillary Clinton were asked to testify before a House hearing about Jeffrey Epstein.

“Every person has to decide when have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country,” the Clintons declare. “For us, now is that time.”

And they’re going to fight by not testifying about Epstein.

Their full reply was an 8-page letter that had more arm-waving and pulpit-pounding than unusual even for the Clintons, touching on…

1. Renee Good being shot after trying to drive over an ICE officer

2. The arrests of Muslim terrorists

3. Praise for Rep. Thomas Massie

4. Complaints that Epstein’s victims are being forced to “relive” their painful experiences.

5. Complaints about “decades-old photos” involving Epstein and the Clintons (like the one above) being released. (How old should photos involving a 90s president and sex offender be?)

6. A line about “pursuing autopens instead of penning laws” that someone thought was funny.

And…

7. They’re not coming.

The Clintons claim the congressional subpoenas are “unlawful”, because… Trump. Also this bizarre sentence, “you have chosen not to consider subpoenaing the sitting Attorney General to follow the law.” --->READ MORE HERE

Powerful House Republican will hold Clintons to account after they skip Epstein depositions:

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) moved to hold Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress on Wednesday, one day after signaling he would do so when her husband, former President Bill Clinton, declined to appear for a deposition.

Oversight Republicans had scheduled mandatory interviews with the former first couple for Jan. 13 and 14 — but the Clintons informed Comer that they would decline to answer any questions in person about their “personal relationship” with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein

“I think what’s most disappointing to the Oversight Committee is the fact that we have, in good faith, negotiated with the Clintons’ attorney for five months,” Comer said Tuesday. “Throughout the past five months, they’ve implied to us they are trying to make a date work.”

“We’re going to hold both Clintons in criminal contempt of Congress,” the GOP chairman noted, adding that Democrats “wanted the Clintons to come” too — though none appeared for the scheduled depositions with Bill or Hillary Clinton.

“These subpoenas issued to the Clintons are not suggestions. They are legally required to appear. They are not above the law,” Comer also posted on X, noting contempt proceedings in his committee will be held on Jan. 21.

The former president and ex-secretary of state in a Tuesday letter lashed out at Comer and Oversight Republicans for “trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,” while calling their subpoenas “invalid and legally unenforceable.”

In written declarations attached to the letter, both said they could not recall interactions with Epstein when they were holding public office, and Bill Clinton said he had only limited contact with him shortly after by using his private jet for “philanthropic and life-saving humanitarian efforts.”

Comer told reporters: “There are records that would imply that Epstein helped raise money for the Clinton Foundation.”

Members of the Oversight panel voted in a bipartisan fashion last year to subpoena the Clintons and half a dozen other former Attorneys General, FBI Directors and other federal officials for questioning about the Department of Justice’s investigative work on the Epstein case.