A tragic - and pathetic - betrayal.
More cases of Muslim migrants murdering people at random in the UK make clear that the British government cannot keep its people safe. Some of the latest examples can be found here: “Britain Is Failing to Keep Its People Safe,” by Lauren Smith, European Conservative, November 1, 2025:
Deng Chol Majek had been in the UK for less than three months when he murdered hotel worker Rhiannon Whyte. Almost exactly a year ago, he stabbed the 27-year-old mother 23 times with a screwdriver while she waited for a train at Bescot Stadium station, Walsall. After throwing Whyte’s phone into the river, Majek left her for dead. He then went to buy some beers and returned to the Park Inn Hotel, where Whyte was employed and which had been turned into an asylum centre. One witness described him as “drinking, smoking and just chatting amongst his group of friends … having a good time.”
Whyte’s injuries were severe—11 of the 23 blows delivered to her body struck her head. One of them pierced her brainstem. But she did not die straight away, instead lying unconscious in hospital for three days before she finally passed away. In court last week, Majek showed no remorse for what he had done, and even tried to claim that the DNA and CCTV evidence were “wrong.” He also tried to lie about his age, telling the court he was 19 years old, when he is more likely to be in his mid-20s. No motive has been established for the attack, but, thankfully, Majek has been found guilty and awaits sentencing later this year….
Majek had arrived in the UK via small boat in 2024, after having made his way from his home country of Sudan to Libya, Italy, and then Germany, where he was denied asylum….MMonday evening at 5pm, a 49-year-old binman named Wayne Broadhurst took his dog out for a walk in Uxbridge, Greater London. He, like Whyte, was killed in what looks to be a completely random attack. The suspect is a 22-year-old Afghan refugee named Safi Dawood, who was charged yesterday with the murder of Broadhurst, as well as two counts of attempted murder…. It may come as no surprise that Dawood came to this country illegally. The Home Office has confirmed that he arrived in the UK via lorry in 2020, and was granted asylum and leave to remain two years later.
And why was Dawood granted asylum? Was he in any danger in Afghanistan from the Taliban? Was he a Christian, or an insufficiently fanatical Muslim? He sounds as if he would have had no trouble feigning fanaticism, if the occasion warranted. And why was asylum granted to him after he entered the country illegally? Shouldn’t that have disqualified him?
A few days after Wayne Broadhurst was murdered and Rhiannon Whyte’s killer was convicted, Haybe Cabdiraxmaan Nur was jailed for life for the murder of a man in a bank. In May this year, Nur—a 47-year-old asylum seeker from Somalia—stabbed Gurvinder Singh Johal to death unprovoked in a busy Lloyds Bank in Derby. The details of the case will be tragically familiar to many people by now. Nur came to the UK in a small boat in October last year and had a number of convictions in at least four European countries, including for robbery, assault, and resisting a public official. For some reason, none of these records were shared with local police in Derbyshire.
--->READ MORE HERE
“You were clearly deeply offended.”
On the heels of the UK recognizing an Islamic terrorist state in Israel, police arrested the third known person for criticising Hamas and released a Muslim man who had gone on a stabbing spree after he saw a Koran being burned. Or as the judge in the case put it, “the holy Koran.”
Who is the Koran holy to? The political and judicial systems of the United Kingdom which have effectively enacted Islamic Sharia blasphemy law by selectively prosecuting those who offend Islam. But not those who offend the religious sensibilities of Christians or Jews. Do whatever you like with a cross or a bible, but touch a Koran and you’re not only under arrest.
You’re also fair game for a stabbing.
Hamit Coskun, a half-Armenian and half-Kurdish gentleman, both of whose halves have suffered from genocide under Turkish Islamist rule, decided to protest by burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London while shouting “Islam is religion of terrorism”.
Moussa Kadri set out to prove him right by fetching a knife and stabbing at him while shouting, “I’m going to kill you”. The Muslim terrorist explained to the police that he was just out to “protect my religion” in the traditional Islamic fashion through violence.
And the British authorities were typically understanding of Muslim violence against non-Muslims.
Moussa Kadrhas, the Muslim stabber, was freed on bail, while Hamit Coskun, the non-violent non-Muslim stabber, was kept locked up. In the UK, being stabbed by a Muslim is considered a more serious sign of guilt than the actual stabbing. And the authorities were much more worried about Coskun, a self-proclaimed “atheist” and “critic of Islam” on the loose, than just another one of the thousands of Muslim terrorists who are already freely running around the country.
The stabbing victim was charged with the unique crime of “having intent to cause against the religious institution of Islam”. This had not previously been a crime in any non-Muslim country, but with a Muslim ‘justice minister’ enforcing Islamic law, that may no longer be an accurate description of the United Kingdom anyway.
When the case came before the court of justice, District Judge John McGarva denounced Hamit Coskun for his “highly provocative” behavior. “Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.”
The Muslim stabber’s trial however was far more leniently handled.
Even though Moussa had allegedly shouted “I’m going to kill you” while stabbing at another human being (or at least a human being), he was only charged with possession of a knife and common assault, not attempted murder. The authorities allowed the stabber to send in a picture of the knife and he sent in a picture of a palette knife rather than the bread knife he actually used.
The stabber’s judge was as kind and understanding as the stabbee’s judge had not been.
Judge Adam Hiddleston, who had previously been part of an organization that defended Muslim illegal alien invaders, let the Muslim stabber go with a suspended sentence because “you were clearly deeply offended by a man who was protesting outside the consulate and who as part of his protest had set fire to the holy Quran.” Whom was the Koran holy to? Hiddleston. --->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment