Russiagate Wouldn’t Have Been Possible Without A Complicit Propaganda Press:
The media can’t honestly report on Russiagate because to do so would require acknowledging their role in helping foment the charade.
There’s a good rule of thumb when analyzing any major news story. That is, if the propaganda media are either refusing to cover it and/or downplaying it, there’s a good chance it’s damning to them and their Democrat allies.
That’s been the case these past few weeks, as leftists scramble to bury newly declassified materials showing how the Obama administration manufactured “evidence” to advance the false claim that Russia wanted Donald Trump to win the 2016 election. The records not only expose the intentional manipulation of intelligence to push this baseless conspiracy and the overarching Trump-Russia collusion hoax, but the participation of President Obama and his intel chiefs in fomenting the scheme to delegitimize Trump’s 2016 victory and subsequent presidency.
And how exactly have legacy media “journalists” responded to this enormous scandal? By attempting to discredit it, of course!
When Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard disclosed a batch of bombshell documents last week, so-called “news” organizations like CNN, CBS News, NBC News, the Associated Press, and The New York Times rushed to sweep the explosive revelations under the rug. “Move along, folks! There’s nothing to see here,” or so the conventional framing from these outlets went.
While a desire to protect their Democrat allies is certainly part of it, the bigger motivation behind the media’s attempts to cover up the latest Russiagate revelations has to do with the fact that they’ve acted as co-conspirators in the hoax from the very beginning. Put another way, they can’t honestly report on Russiagate because to do so would require acknowledging their role in helping foment the charade.
Consider that these regime propagandists, without a hint of circumspection, leapt at the earliest opportunity to disseminate the phony Trump-Russia allegations on the intel community’s behalf.
Weeks before Trump took office, for example, fake news CNN published an article by Jake Tapper, Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, and Carl Bernstein on a classified briefing presented to Trump that included “allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” Americans would later learn this “compromising” information originated from the Steele dossier — a collection of baseless and absurd accusations against Trump that was cobbled together by an opposition research group hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign’s law firm to dig up dirt on Trump. --->READ MORE HERE
Russiagate Shows How Media Use Fake ‘Fact Checks’ To Launder Info Ops:
When Trump began calling out the hoax in real time, the ‘fact-checkers’ swooped in to dismiss his claims.
The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler recently announced he would be leaving the outlet after more than a decade as its lead “fact-checker.” The role of “fact-checkers” — invented by the left-wing press — has served not to clarify the facts but rather to manipulate public perception. And nowhere is this role more apparent than in how the media’s “fact-checkers” — including Kessler — covered the Russia collusion hoax, helping legitimize a Hillary Clinton-campaign-funded lie aimed at undermining and sabotaging President Donald Trump.
Newly declassified documents show that then-President Barack Obama and his high-ranking members of the intelligence community included the now-debunked Steele dossier in their 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that attempted to link President Donald Trump and his campaign to Russia. The dossier was opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign. Despite warnings from intelligence experts that the dossier was flawed, the dossier was nonetheless included in the ICA and served as the basis for furthering the Russia collusion hoax.
But when Trump began calling out the hoax in real time, the “fact-checkers” swooped in to dismiss his claims.
Trump posted on Oct. 19, 2017, that “workers of firm involved with the discredited and Fake Dossier take the 5th. Who paid for it, Russia, the FBI or the Dems (or all)?”
Rather than investigate the substance of this question, Kessler instead dismissed Trump’s concern in a post: “It’s worth rereading the dossier these days. Some material unverified or salacious. But you can see why the FBI saw it as a Rosetta Stone.”
Kessler’s post, as The Federalist’s Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway pointed out, “is a great example of how ‘fact’ ‘checking’ is almost without exception just the laundering of Democrat info ops with another layer of supposed credibility.”
In another instance, Kessler emphatically declared that “the Russia investigation did not start with the Steele dossier.”
But as The Federalist’s Elle Purnell explained, three days after the Clinton campaign peddled its bogus Steele dossier to intelligence officials, the FBI began its investigation — known as Crossfire Hurricane — into the Trump campaign in hopes of finding “collusion between Trump and Russia to steal the 2016 election.” --->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK
here, GETTR
here, and TWITTER
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment