 |
| Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images |
When a nation bears the blame for more than 7 million deaths worldwide, what is Washington going to do?
More than 1.2 million Americans died as a result of a plague that began in China.
Those staggering global and US figures are the numbers reported to the World Health Organization.
They make the COVID-19 pandemic the deadliest event the human race has suffered since World War II.
The presence of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the city where the scourge originated raised suspicions from the start — was this an unnatural disaster?
China was studying coronaviruses in that laboratory, conducting “gain of function” research that often makes pathogens more infectious and deadly, yet much of America’s media reflexively dismissed any possibility of a lab leak, calling it a conspiracy theory born of racist paranoia.
That labeling didn’t silence the discussion, however:
If anything, hearing many of the same organizations that staked their credibility on assurances of Joe Biden’s physical and mental fitness to serve as president insist a lab-leak scenario is just a conspiracy theory has made some Americans all the more determined to ask the questions they’re told they mustn’t ask.
Now the Trump administration has weighed in, unveiling a new White House web page last month titled, “Lab Leak: The True Origins of COVID-19.”
But if President Trump thinks Chinese experiments are responsible for more than a million American deaths, how tough is he willing to get on Beijing?
He’s prepared to punish other nations for the toll their trade strategies have taken on us in mere dollar terms.
China is the biggest offender in that respect — but the cost of COVID has been incalculably greater, in lives, not just national wealth. --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| KOBU Agency/Unsplash |
The closest point of access that we have to the Wuhan lab is Dr. Peter Daszak. DOJ needs to start asking him questions.
Employees at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) walked out as their new boss, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, spoke this week on truths that remain to be sought out about Covid-19. As a lead on the October 2020 Great Barrington Declaration that sought to shift sweeping societal shutdowns to “focused protection” on the vulnerable, Bhattacharya is no newcomer to speaking the truth about Covid or being vilified for doing so. Fortunately, an unheralded investigation by the Department of Justice of an obscure nonprofit company has the potential to reveal five years of hidden truths.
Bhattacharya’s words that sparked the walkout were straightforward: “It’s possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it’s also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research.” Seeking the possible amongst the plausible is the backbone of the scientific approach. In the case of the Wuhan lab leak theory, “possible” looks increasingly “plausible” as more evidence slowly — and as the NIH walkout demonstrates —grudgingly comes to light.
NEW: NIH Director @DrJBhattacharya sparks mass walkout from NIH employees after suggesting COVID-19 may have originated from the Wuhan lab — and that NIH helped fund it.
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) May 20, 2025
"It's possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it's also possible… pic.twitter.com/r74gv0iqcw
The possibility of long-delayed revelation lies in an ongoing DOJ investigation involving EcoHealth Alliance. Both the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on Covid-19’s 500-page pandemic report and the recently published book, In Covid’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us, by Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee repeatedly put EcoHealth Alliance at the crossroads of pandemic controversy — from funding, to research, to reporting on the virus’s origins and the CCP’s initial efforts to combat the pandemic.
The press release accompanying the subcommittee’s report states: Covid-19 “most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China,” that “a lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19,” that EcoHealth “under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” and that NIH contributed to the catastrophe with “procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research” which are “deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security.” --->READ MORE HEREFollow links below to relevant/related stories and resources:
What new COVID variant means for US health officials
How Navajo Physicians Are Battling the Covid-19 Pandemic
USA TODAY: Coronavirus Updates
WSJ: Coronavirus Live Updates
YAHOO NEWS: Coronavirus Live Updates
NEW YORK POST: Coronavirus The Latest
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment