While Republicans are attacked for telling the truth.
Democrats’ Party pearl-clutchers, perverts, and activists pretended to be upset last week over the idea that we’re all going to die. The fact is, we will all die someday, though their bad ideas will live on – 100,000,000 people were killed in the pursuit of the progressive political philosophy over the last century. There isn’t a single leftist alive who is bothered by that fact who can attest to that fact.
Iowa Senator Joni Ernst told a group of liberals whining over the prospect of able-bodied adults without young children having to work to receive medical welfare that “Well, we’re all going to die.” And yes, Medicaid is medical welfare – a program for the poor to cover their health care costs that was expanded by the left during COVID to cover people who are not poor.
The idea of rolling back an expansion that didn’t exist 5 years ago is now considered (by Democrat drones) to be an attack on families, which is weird because they spend an awful lot of time trying to prevent families from coming into being with abortion.
In the least shocking turn of event since the sun rising in the east this morning, Democrat sleazebags jumped on this like it was a moderately attractive intern in a left-wing committee office up on the Hill to pretend Ernst was in favor of facilitating “literal deaths” of Americans because they want to give “tax cuts to billionaires.”
It’s something so stupid it makes Eric Swalwell capable of tying his own shoes.
Honestly, when you have Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, trying to lecture about “morality” a few months after he left his wife and family for a much younger woman, a left-wing, Soros-funded activist, who I assume is a woman. Still, with Democrats, you can’t ever be sure.
What Ernst said was undeniably true, and the Republican bill will only remove able-bodied, non-poor people from Medicaid if they refuse to work or volunteer for 20 hours per week. How is that “killing people”? It’s not, of course, but Democrats haven’t been bound by reality for a generation, so why would they start now?
Rather than explain how a family of 4 making $80,000 per year qualifies for welfare designed to help poor people, they’d rather claim Republicans want them dead. Rather than explain how millions of illegal aliens are not only entitled to live in this country simply because they want to, they’d rather insist they “deserve” health care paid for by everyone else. People who have contributed nothing to society, and will never contribute more than they take, most of them cannot communicate in English, are illiterate in their own language thanks to the failed education system in their home countries, and whose children slow down and damage the education of American children. --->READ MORE HERE
The 2024 election didn’t go as planned for Democrats. Besides solidifying the working class and non-college-educated voters in President Donald Trump’s camp, the race exposed the degree to which young men are disenchanted with the Democratic Party. They have been steadily shifting away from Democrats over the last two decades, but most of this drop-off has happened since 2016, coinciding with Trump’s arrival on the political scene. Trump turned a predictable Generation Z gender partisan gap into a chasm. While 51% of young men used to identify as Democrat, now more young men identify as Republican, according to the Survey Center on American Life.
Since losing in November, Democrats have tried to figure out what drove young men away. Self-proclaimed bro whisperer Tim Walz recently consulted his son on the question. Gus Walz boiled it down to MAGA’s “entertainment” appeal and sports-like camaraderie, according to his father. Reducing to simpletons the very demographic their party is so desperate to court, the pair missed a more intuitive answer. Young men gravitated toward the party, and the person, that projected confidence and normalcy.
Statistician Nate Silver argued in a recent blog post that part of the Democrats’ problem with young men is that they’re seen as “neurotic, risk-averse, sticklers for the rules, always up in everyone’s business.”
In the last few months, it seems Democrats have done everything in their power to present themselves as basket cases. They sang songs on Capitol Hill to protest government cost-cutting, shouted down Trump’s joint address to Congress, and sat down with an alleged domestic abuser illegal immigrant for a photo op. They’re filled with political paranoia, which they tried to foist onto the public in 2024 but failed. Young men, especially, rejected neuroticism at the ballot box and chose rationality instead.
Speaking from my experience with Gen Z brothers, I know young men spurn scolds and dictates they deem nonsensical and constraining, whether they’re COVID-19 regulations or Black Lives Matter demands. Silver’s research found that men generally have higher risk tolerance than women and that younger people are more risk tolerant than older ones. The year 2020 was one of herd mentality, but young men resisted.
Amid the draconian Biden and blue state response to COVID, young men didn’t appear to panic as much as their female counterparts. Women were more likely than men to believe the consequences of the pandemic were serious, to agree with restraining rules, and to comply with them by 8.5, 5.6, and 4.9 percentage points, respectively, according to a paper from the National Institutes of Health. Women had a higher risk perception of the virus and demonstrated greater compliance with preventive government orders compared to men, according to an October 2024 scientific paper.
Men had a more positive attitude toward the vaccine than women, however, suggesting that young men were eager to apply what they viewed as the solution to the problem so they could resume business as usual. From the start of the pandemic, however, Walz expressed little interest in moving forward; in 2020, he launched a snitch program for reporting social distancing violations. Trump’s campaign resurrected this forgotten scandal to remind voters that Walz chose prolonged emergency, expecting neighbors to spy on neighbors, rather than respect people’s freedom and defer to their good judgement on a disease that could not reasonably be contained. That episode, and the fact that Walz delayed calling in the National Guard to quell the 2020 riots, showed many young men that he was a cowardly and incompetent leader. --->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment