The truth behind the British government’s reign of political terror.
On August 8, Bernadette Spofforth, a 55-year-old British Twitter user, was dragged out of her home, arrested and held for 36 hours for posting that the murderer of 3 girls in Southport was a Muslim terrorist. The charge she was held under was “posting inaccurate information”.
Bernadette was one of thousands of people arrested in a massive crackdown by the Starmer government aimed at suppressing political dissent over its open borders migrant policies.
After Axel Rudakubana, a Muslim terrorist, entered a children’s Taylor Swift dance workshop and stabbed 11 little girls, killing 3 of them, British authorities declared an emergency. The emergency was not the latest act of horrifying Muslim terrorism targeting local children.
It was that some of its citizens had noticed the latest Muslim terror attack and were outraged.
These included the the Dublin stabbing of children outside a Catholic school by Riad Bouchaker, an Algerian Muslim or the Manchester Arena bombing at an Arianna Grande concert by the Muslim Abedi family which wounded over 1,000 people and killed 22 people, many of them children, forming a consistent pattern of Muslim child killing.
The Southport stabbing at a Taylor Swift dance workshop fit the pattern. So did the immediate torrent of media disinformation accompanied by police threats and government crackdowns.
British authorities, which usually make a point of withholding the names of Muslim terrorists for as long as possible, released Axel Rudakubana’s name even though he was underage. Axel’s name and his Rwandan background were used to mislead the public into believing he was not a Muslim. In reality, the authorities knew he was a Muslim convert and did not reveal that.
Instead the authorities began arresting people for describing the stabbings as a Muslim terrorist attack. Media outlets, including Sky News, conducted ‘analyses’ of ‘misinformation’ denouncing trending hashtags like “Southport Muslim”. PM Starmer demanded an immediate crackdown on such ‘misinformation’ as posing a threat to public safety and the justice system.
While the Starmer government and British authorities had tolerated and continued to tolerate widespread Muslim terrorist rallies calling for the murder of Jews at which the flags of known terrorist organizations are waved, they declared an emergency over open borders protests.
Dystopian scenes were televised of police raiding people’s homes for “spreading misinformation”. Over 1,000 people were arrested for protesting and speaking their minds. In the same nation where police stood by while Muslim waved Hamas flags, shouting “who the f___ is Allah” earned a 61-year-old British man over a year in prison for opposing open borders.
This was in sharp contrast to the soft treatment meted out to Muslim terrorists like Mohisnath Chowdhury, who had attacked police officers with a sword outside Buckingham Palace while shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and spent only a year in prison, before being released, and then arrested yet again for another terrorist plot targeting British people and tourists in London. --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| VIA REUTERS |
Prosecutors delayed charging Southport murder suspect Axel Rudakubana for up to fortnight due to fears it may spark riots, it emerged tonight.
The 18-year-old accused of murdering three girls during a knife rampage in July was due to be charged with making the highly toxic poison ricin and possessing a study of an al-Qaeda training manual on October 18, but the CPS and Attorney General stalled due to fears it would lead to disorder.
The mass stabbing at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport on July 29 which killed Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine and left 10 others injured sparked riots across Britain culminating in more than 1,000 arrests over the summer.
Police chiefs feared the revelation that the suspect had allegedly been making ricin and possessed information likely to be useful to a terrorist would cause further unrest and accordingly made preparations to cancel police leave across the country over the weekend of October 19.
At the time chief constables were also worried about the prospect of firearms officers downing their weapons in protest across the UK if Scotland Yard marksman Martyn Blake were to be found guilty of murdering gangster Chris Kaba in an unrelated police vehicle stop in September 2022.
In the event Blake was acquitted at the Old Bailey just days later which meant fears of a national firearms officer walkout did not materialise.
Today the Sunday Times revealed that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) first sought permission from the Attorney General's office to charge Rudakubana with possession of a biological weapon on October 15.
While the CPS normally makes decisions to charge suspects independently, there are a small number of serious offences such as the biological weapons charge that require consent from the government's two law officers, the attorney general and solicitor general.
Extensive plans were then made for a public charging announcement on October 18.
On that day, sources say that as many as 1,000 riot police had been placed on standby in anticipation that the news could trigger another series of violent demonstrations.
In the end, the Attorney General's office did not grant consent until a week later on October 22.
It took a further seven days for the CPS to announce the charges on October 29.
The postponement in announcing charges, which came more than two months after the teenager was charged with three counts of murder and ten attempted murders sparked immediate claims of a cover up. --->READ MORE HEREFollow link below to a related story:
Ministers should have known ‘within hours’ about ricin found in Southport suspect’s home
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment