 |
If there were any doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed widespread corruption in America’s health care establishment, a federal lawsuit should put it to rest.
Filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, Murthy v. Missouri accuses the Biden administration of censoring medical views it dislikes.
So, what did the American Medical Association do? The doctors guild lined up with the censors in an amicus brief.
That’s right. It’s their way or the highway, science be damned.
The AMA doesn’t see it that way, of course. It views itself as a guardian of science and sound medicine against heresies that challenge the prevailing narrative.
Americans need to remember that guilds such as the AMA are not official in any way; they represent the interests of their members, just like the teachers unions that put themselves — not students — first.
So-called heresies denounced by the medical establishment often have a way of turning out to be true, as we saw many times amid the COVID-19 hysteria.
Many Americans believe that the COVID-19 shots, for the most part, saved lives. The problem is the government’s censorship of any dissenting views, its smearing of alternative treatments and its suppression of news about adverse effects.
Major medical journals have been caught publishing bogus research articles reinforcing the pro-vaccine narrative and have had to withdraw them.
The Food and Drug Administration has been spectacularly dishonest in misrepresenting human dose forms of ivermectin as horse deworming paste dangerous to humans. Yes, if you swallow the amount of paste meant for a 1-ton horse, not the pills safe for humans.
The Murthy v. Missouri lawsuit, filed by the two states, several social media users and Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft, argues that the Biden administration coerced social media platforms into suppressing COVID-19 content.
The censorship is supported not only by the AMA but also by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians and the American Geriatrics Society. --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| Getty Images |
As a primary care physician, I administer vaccines on a regular basis, from flu to tetanus to pneumonia to shingles.I bring these vaccines out during doctor visits, and I discuss the pros and cons with my patients while the vaccines are being displayed.
I am completely open about potential side effects.
The core vaccine conversation between doctor and patient is a risk/benefit analysis.
It’s a discussion, one in which the patient decides.
One of the big mistakes made by the Biden administration with the COVID vaccines is not having this discussion.
Rather than keeping expectations realistic — telling folks that the vaccine would lessen the severity of COVID, instead of preventing a patient from getting it — the administration forced as many as it could to get the jab through mandates.
Instead of being up front that there was a slight risk of side effects, the administration put pressure on social media companies to censor any discussion.
Now we have research data from the Global Vaccine Data Network that detail exactly what risks accompany the COVID vaccines.
The study found what has been shown previously in smaller studies — that side effects from the vaccines are mostly mild, but they aren’t non-existent.
The study showed an association between the mRNA vaccines and rare myocarditis, and between the Oxford Astra Zeneca vaccine — which was never approved for use in the United States — and pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and other neurological complications. --->READ MORE HEREFollow links below to relevant/related stories and resources:
Fauci’s critique of COVID-19 response is good, but not enough
How to watch 'Breathtaking' online now: stream the explosive Covid pandemic drama for free today
USA TODAY: Coronavirus Updates
WSJ: Coronavirus Live Updates
YAHOO NEWS: Coronavirus Live Updates
NEW YORK POST: Coronavirus The Latest
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment