The big boon for public advocacy lawyers.
As a record number of migrants invade the U.S., wreaking pain on New York City and other communities, one group is winning big-time: the public advocacy lawyers. Their business is to constantly sue to win more so-called rights for migrants. Rights to shelter, rights to meals, rights to health care, even the right to vote in local elections.
Who pays the bills on both sides of these lawsuits? You do. Taxpayer money largely funds these legal combatants, which include the Coalition for the Homeless, Legal Aid Society, and Vera Institute of Justice.
You’re paying to be legally coerced into providing more for migrants, even at the cost of cutting vital city services — kind of like hiring your own assassin. It’s absurd, but it’s about to get worse.
On Dec. 14, the New York City Council passed Resolution 556, calling on the state legislature to guarantee, as a right, that all migrants have lawyers paid for by taxpayers when they go to immigration court. It would be a “first-in-the-nation” guarantee.
Resolution 556 would give migrants more rights than American citizens have. No one else is guaranteed a publicly funded lawyer in civil court matters such as housing court issues or divorce.
Yikes, the city council’s proposal would make the Big Apple even more of a magnet for migrants than it already is.
Who’s behind this push? The Vera Institute of Justice, for one.
Vera claims we “need a federally funded universal legal defense service” for migrants. In short, a national army of left-wing lawyers paid by you. What better place to launch this lunatic idea than at the New York City Council? --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| YouTube |
In a controversial move, the New York City Council passed Resolution 556, a groundbreaking policy ensuring legal representation for migrants in immigration court, entirely funded by taxpayer dollars. This development places New York City at the forefront of migrant advocacy, potentially setting a national precedent. Critics argue this measure grants migrants more legal rights than American citizens in various civil court matters like housing and divorce, where legal counsel is not guaranteed.
This policy also raises questions about the allocation of city resources, especially considering recent budget cuts in other sectors. The resolution's potential impact extends beyond legal realms, possibly making New York City an even greater magnet for migrants. Critics see this as a paradox where taxpayer money is being used to fund advocacy groups that are pushing for policies that further strain city resources. --->WATCH and READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment