No, COVID didn’t come from a US lab — Lancet report continues the China coverup; Phony fact-checkers and social media cops lose AGAIN in fight to find real origins of COVID, and other C-Virus related stories

HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images

No, COVID didn’t come from a US lab — Lancet report continues the China coverup:

Now that the COVID-19 pandemic is finally over — we have President Joe Biden’s word on this — the Lancet Commission set up more than two years ago to investigate it has finally issued a report.

It’s a huge disappointment as it dances around the key question of origins: “More than 2 years into the pandemic, the search for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 remains incomplete and inconclusive.”

Its weak-sauce conclusion — maybe it came from a lab, maybe it came from nature — has given an opening to a China-led disinformation campaign that claims against all evidence the virus was actually created in a US lab.

Indeed, the report itself has greatly aided this interpretation by somehow managing to blame America: “Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses, nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan.” It adds that the US National Institutes of Health “has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting, providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.”

This is worse than moral equivalence. The report, from a leading medical journal, condemns the United States for not allowing investigations of its labs and engaging in a coverup. Then it trails off into vagueness when discussing China and cannot even bring itself to mention the Wuhan Institute of Virology by name. --->READ MORE HERE

Photo by JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images

Phony fact-checkers and social media cops lose AGAIN in fight to find real origins of COVID:

In yet another black mark for social media censorship, it turns out that one of the key figures in the blocking of the February 2020 Post opinion column that floated the COVID lab-leak theory had a huge vested interest in suppressing the idea.

Prominent virologist Danielle Anderson served as one of the loudest voices condemning Steven Mosher’s prescient and since-vindicated column, which explained that the pandemic might have started at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But now it turns out she was deeply involved in the risky gain-of-function research that many analysts now believe may have led to the initial COVID outbreak.

That is, she was protecting her own work, and that of her colleagues, from scrutiny and/or ill repute.

Anderson called our story “appalling” and “infuriating” and said claims that the institute was a bioweapons-research facility were “simply false.” Yet her name appeared on grants for projects working with coronaviruses, including one from the National Institutes of Health to Peter Daszak, a central figure in the global effort to demonize any talk of an unnatural origin for COVID (along with Anthony Fauci and other infectious-disease bigwigs). --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to relevant/related stories and resources:

‘NYPD Officers Can’t Be Fired for Refusing Covid-19 Vaccine, Judge Rules

Judge orders NYPD union members fired over vax mandate reinstated

USA TODAY: Coronavirus Updates

WSJ: Coronavirus Live Updates

YAHOO NEWS: Coronavirus Live Updates

NEW YORK POST: Coronavirus The Latest

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.