 |
| peterschreiber/Getty Images |
It was one of the worst human rights violations of the COVID regime, and it’s still going on in most hospitals. Hospitals were de-listing people from organ transplant lists who would not get the COVID shots, no matter how much information came out on how the shots were unsafe and ineffective, particularly among the immunocompromised. From day one, the policy should have been the other way around – kidneys shouldn’t have been wasted on those who got the shots – and now we have the proof.
According to a study published by Japanese researchers last month in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, a number of patients receiving cornea transplants experienced rejections of the cornea tissue following the COVID vaccines. Cornea grafts are considered a much lower-risk transplant procedure than solid organ transplants and tend to have a much lower rejection rate. Which is why the researchers were surprised to find a total of 23 eyes from 21 patients who had undergone corneal graft procedures who experienced rejection anywhere from one day to six weeks following COVID vaccination. In some cases, the rejection occurred suddenly after being jabbed despite the cornea graft having held steady for many years.
Like so many other studies indicating concerning safety signals about the shot, don’t expect any follow-up to this analysis. If our government really cared about safety and science, it would immediately identify these cases of rejected corneal tissue and study them for spike protein and other tissue protein expression markers.
What this study demonstrates is that rather than accusing the unvaccinated recipients of potentially wasting a transplant, we should be studying whether vaccinated recipients might be at higher risk of wasting transplants and whether vaccinated donors run the risk of transferring to the recipients the spike protein through the grafted tissue or in solid organs --->READ MORE HERE
 |
| Joe Raedle/Getty Images |
The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has acknowledged publicly for the first time that the agency gave false information about its COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring.
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the agency’s director, said in a letter made public on Sept. 12 that the CDC did not analyze certain types of adverse event reports at all in 2021, despite the agency previously saying it started in February 2021.
“CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25, 2022, through July 31, 2022,” Walensky said. “CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times to clarify PRR were not run between February 26, 2021, to September 30, 2021.”
Walensky’s agency had promised in several documents, starting in early 2021, to perform a type of analysis called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) on reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which it helps manage.
But the agency said in June that it did not perform PRRs. It also said that performing them was “outside th[e] agency’s purview.”
Confronted with the contradiction, Dr. John Su, a CDC official, told The Epoch Times in July that the agency started performing PRRs in February 2021 and “continues to do so to date.”
But just weeks later, the CDC said Su was wrong. --->READ MORE HEREFollow links below to relevant/related stories and resources:
Axios-Ipsos poll: Roll credits on the pandemic
Remote working no longer required at Pentagon as DOD declares coronavirus risk at its lowest level since the pandemic began
USA TODAY: Coronavirus Updates
WSJ: Coronavirus Live Updates
YAHOO NEWS: Coronavirus Live Updates
NEW YORK POST: Coronavirus The Latest
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment