To listen to the establishment media, Tuesday was the day that the ceiling finally caved in on President Donald Trump.
Bill Taylor, who currently serves as the top American diplomat to Ukraine, testified about an alleged quid pro quo involving Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The media hailed the testimony as “devastating,” “stunning,” “brutal” and “explosive” and euphoric.
Wait, that last one describes the media’s mood after Taylor’s testimony, not their description of his testimony.
The coverage was quick and self-satisfied.
On Wednesday, though, The New York Times published a piece that throws the entire testimony into question and actually supports one of Trump’s fundamental arguments about this impeachment nonsense.
Of course, The Times did its best to bury the important part.
If you’re willing to dig past eight paragraphs of propagandizing, you will find the following passage in The Times story, titled, “An Envoy’s Damning Account of Trump’s Ukraine Pressure and Its Consequences.”
 |
“Mr. Taylor neither described any direct conversation with Mr. Trump himself nor made any reference to documents or recordings that would explicitly implicate the president. Instead, he provided a road map for investigators by quoting others around Mr. Trump describing his actions and statements,” the piece reads.
Read that first part again: “Mr. Taylor neither described any direct conversation with Mr. Trump himself nor made any reference to documents or recordings that would explicitly implicate the president.”Read the rest from Josh Manning HERE and follow link below to a related story/opinion:
Who is William Taylor? Impeachment Star Witness Has Long Relationship with Burisma-Backed Think Tank
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
1 comment:
Gee, I remember back in the good old days of 2018, when hearsay was inadmissible...
Post a Comment