Since the beginning of the Trump-Ukraine scandal, the left and much of the media have acted as if the whistleblower at the center of the ordeal was a good Samaritan who had only the best interests of the nation at heart.
But as more details emerge, that presumption could be falling apart. A respected investigative journalist has now staked his reputation on a report that far from being a proverbial Boy Scout, the whistleblower may actually have been a liberal operative with close ties to the Obama administration.
If true, that claim could put the scandal in the same category as the now-debunked “Russian collusion” claims — a desperate play by Democrats to stop the sitting president without having to actually defeat him on election day.
On Thursday, veteran reporter Paul Sperry dropped two bombshells onto Twitter. The first was that the whistleblower who cried foul over Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president was a disgruntled Obama-era CIA analyst and loyal Democrat.
The second claim, posted hours later, was that this same figure had been tasked with opposition research against Trump on behalf of the Obama administration prior to the 2016 election.
“BREAKING: The whistleblower is a registered Democrat & CIA analyst who was detailed before the 2016 election to the Obama White House,where he worked on the NSC’s Ukraine desk & met w anti-Trump Ukrainian officials before being sent packing by the Trump NSC & becoming disgruntled,” Sperry tweeted. --->Read the rest of the story HERE.
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment