Monday, October 1, 2018

Kavanaugh Accuser Lied About Background, Has History Of Making Sexual Misconduct Claims In Workplace, Report Says

Avenatti Twitter/Getty Images
One of the women who has accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct from over 30 years ago allegedly has an extensive history of making sexual misconduct claims in the workplace and has lied about her background to employers.
Julie Swetnick, who is represented by sensationalist Democratic lawyer Michael Avenatti, faced serious allegations of misconduct in a lawsuit brought by Portland-based Webtrends, a company where she was employed for a few months in 2000.
Webtrends said in the lawsuit that Swetnick claimed that she graduated from Johns Hopkins University and that the company subsequently learned that the university had no records of her ever attending, and that she also made false claims about her work experience. OregonLive reports:
The suit also alleges Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct" while at Webtrends and "made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her."
The suit alleges Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct" directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.
The tech company said that Swetnick engaged in misconduct but never found any evidence to corroborate any of the allegations she made against her coworkers.
Read the rest of the story HERE.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Who cares. No one ever thought her accusations were credible. Interviewing her is a waste of time. It's another allegation that cannot be proven true or false.

The thing staring everyone in the face is that Kavanaugh lied under oath on thurs. He lied about his past drinking habits, and about the entries in his yearbook. These were lame lies, too. Stupid lies.

Everyone knows he lied about these things. He should not be confirmed based on this alone.

Ford remains a credible witness, who had NOTHING TO GAIN in coming forward. Kavanaugh is the one who has motive to lie. He is looking more and more suspect every day. Logic brings me to believe Ford, and to distrust Kavanaugh.

Not that any of this matters. R's are going to vote him in unless something big happens between now and friday.

But, as we saw on thurs, he will be a dishonest, partisan, unhinged, tainted justice. That is the real tragedy. We could have had someone better.

Martha