President Trump has made a bevy of wonderful appointments to bureaucratic and judicial positions. But what would you say about Trump appointing a bureaucratic nominee who believes that it is illegal sex discrimination to fire a woman who shows up one day saying she is a man, or a man who shows up to work one day saying he is a woman, even though this very situation suggests that sex is malleable and thus not protectable; or that it is illegal sex discrimination for a business to refuse to cover the benefits of same-sex couples, even though sexual orientation is not covered by the Civil Rights Act?
What would you say about President Trump appointing a nominee to the powerful Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) who had written these insane things:
> When sexual orientation and religious freedom come into conflict, “I’m having a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win… Sexual liberty should win in most cases. There can be a conflict between religious liberty and sexual liberty, but in almost all cases the sexual liberty should win because that’s the only way that the dignity of gay people can be affirmed in any realistic manner”;
> “Just as we do not tolerate private racial beliefs that adversely affect African-Americans in the commercial arena, even if such beliefs are based on religious views, we should similarly not tolerate private beliefs about sexual orientation and gender identity that adversely affect the ability of LGBT people to live in the world”;Read the rest from Ben Shapiro HERE.
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment