Friday, May 12, 2017

Tax Cuts Without Spending Limits Will Not Make America Great Again

When the states ratified the 16th Amendment in 1913, the top marginal personal income tax rate was 7% and federal spending was less than 10% of GDP; today the top rate is close to 40% and spending is 21% of GDP.
The tax code has become more and more complex, tax preferences (loopholes) have politicized the system, and high rates are penalizing success. Meanwhile, the mammoth IRS continues to oppress people's liberties.
President Trump's tax reform would simplify the individual income tax by closing loopholes and reducing the number of brackets from seven to three — with marginal rates of 10%, 25% and 35%.
Those changes would take us closer to the flat-tax system first proposed by Robert E. Hall and Alvin Rabushka in 1981, which motivated President Ronald Reagan and Congress to cut the top marginal personal income tax rate from 70% to 28% while closing loopholes to make the reforms "revenue neutral."
There is a strong case for a simple, flat-tax system on grounds of both efficiency and freedom. But tax reform must be tied to downsizing government.
The total tax burden is current taxes plus deferred taxes. Unless spending is cut, the current portion may fall, but the deferred portion will rise, which doesn't reduce the overall tax load over time.
Read the rest of this IBD op-ed HERE and follow a link to a related story below:

Risks To Trump Tax Cuts, Spending Plans Deepen With Comey Firing

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.

No comments: