Op-ed:
Only By Unbinding The Delegates Can Hillary Be Stopped
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots
Last week F.B.I. Director James Comey, via a
televised news conference, announced that after a year-long investigation into
the Hillary Clinton email scandal no recommendation to indict will be
forthcoming from his office. And yet in the next breath he issued stinging
comments against Hillary that gave the Republican presumptive nominee, Donald J.
Trump, ammunition to argue the case that Hillary had still shown poor judgment
that put the security of our nation’s secrets at risk.
But showing poor judgment when the lure of ‘free
stuff’ is still out there might not be enough to stop the Clinton juggernaut
for the only way to stop Hillary is to have her run against a true Republican…a
true conservative…and that would not be Donald J. Trump.
“The convention rules of the Republican Party do not bind delegates to cast their votes according to the results of binding primaries."
-
RNC Council’s Office
And with those words it can now be said that the court case brought by Beau Correll, a Virginia delegate opposed to Trump's nomination sued to have Virginia's votes unbound and guess what...he won! So while Virginia does have a law that delegates to the party conventions are bound to cast their votes for the state winner, the Virginia court late Monday afternoon ruled delegates cannot be "compelled by state law" to cast a vote in a particular way.
And this ruling actually reinforced a Supreme Court ruling from almost forty years ago that stated that state laws could not take precedence over national party rules. And their reasoning was that political parties must be free from government control, especially regarding who the party’s nominee would be, the delegate selection itself, and how the delegates could vote.
So with some now surely now saying that the fix is in, the reality to be remembered is that Republicans win elections when they hold true to both their Republican and conservative principals, but Republicans lose elections when they nominate at convention those who masquerade as Republicans but who actually are Democrats in disguise. One case in point being those life-long Democrats who 'suddenly' switch parties within just a few years...or less...of announcing their run for office.
And with those words it can now be said that the court case brought by Beau Correll, a Virginia delegate opposed to Trump's nomination sued to have Virginia's votes unbound and guess what...he won! So while Virginia does have a law that delegates to the party conventions are bound to cast their votes for the state winner, the Virginia court late Monday afternoon ruled delegates cannot be "compelled by state law" to cast a vote in a particular way.
And this ruling actually reinforced a Supreme Court ruling from almost forty years ago that stated that state laws could not take precedence over national party rules. And their reasoning was that political parties must be free from government control, especially regarding who the party’s nominee would be, the delegate selection itself, and how the delegates could vote.
So with some now surely now saying that the fix is in, the reality to be remembered is that Republicans win elections when they hold true to both their Republican and conservative principals, but Republicans lose elections when they nominate at convention those who masquerade as Republicans but who actually are Democrats in disguise. One case in point being those life-long Democrats who 'suddenly' switch parties within just a few years...or less...of announcing their run for office.
And such is the case with reality TV star and presumptive Republican nominee Donald J. Trump, a man who continues to have and to support liberal leaning causes, policies, and candidates while tenuously straddling both sides of the political fence. And straddle the fence Trump does while he backtracks on stances…stances taken to inflame and pander to the masses…masses who voted in the primaries out of anger instead of out of logic, facts, and a closer vetting of the man who wants to be emperor…for Trump's inflammatory actions and words clearly show that merely being president is not quite good enough for him.
So
now knowing the facts as per both the SCOTUS and the Virginia court
rulings, the question still to be answered is how do we legally get a
true
conservative candidate as the nominee to run against Hillary now that Trump has reached the magic 1237 delegate number…as in a nominee who can actually win in November…how...besides the above stated court adjudications we use the
Republican Party’s own rules to do so.
And some of those very rules were passed at the 2012 Republican National Convention and they pertained to and expanded upon party rules 14 and 16(b)(1)...rules that governed the election and selection of delegates, and included words to the affect that delegates at the national convention are free to ignore state law...rules beginning with the very words “No state law shall be observed…”
And if that wasn't enough, Rule 16(b)(1)...a rule which basically also laid out a chain of command so to speak...as in state party rules take precedence over state laws governing the election and selection of delegates, and that national party rules take precedence over both. And this means that the national party does not accept that state laws take precedence over national party rules.
And some of those very rules were passed at the 2012 Republican National Convention and they pertained to and expanded upon party rules 14 and 16(b)(1)...rules that governed the election and selection of delegates, and included words to the affect that delegates at the national convention are free to ignore state law...rules beginning with the very words “No state law shall be observed…”
And if that wasn't enough, Rule 16(b)(1)...a rule which basically also laid out a chain of command so to speak...as in state party rules take precedence over state laws governing the election and selection of delegates, and that national party rules take precedence over both. And this means that the national party does not accept that state laws take precedence over national party rules.
And not to be forgotten is that at
the 1976 presidential election, out of fear of losing pledged delegates to
Ronald Reagan, the Ford campaign forced the adoption of the ‘Justice
Resolution’ which amended the convention’s long-standing rule of delegates voting
their conscious…voting for whom they so wished…and amended it so that delegates
were now bound to cast their votes for the victor in each state’s primary. This
resolution, thankfully, was short-lived for at the 1980 convention said
resolution was rescinded, thus restoring the right of the delegates to vote as they
saw fit.
“The
Rules of the Republican Party prohibiting the binding of delegates have not
been changed since the 1980 convention.”
-
Curly Haugland, Republican National Committeeman for North Dakota
And while 20 states have passed laws…statutes
actually…that ‘supposedly’ bind their state’s delegates, these statutes cannot
be legally enforced… meaning that Republican delegates at this July’s convention
can indeed legally vote their conscious even on first balloting, because to be
forced to do otherwise does violate the First Amendment and the simple
fact is that it’s the delegates…most especially the ‘super delegates’...who are
the ones who ultimately choose the nominee no matter the primary vote.
How so you ask…you need to understand that a
political party, no matter its party affiliation, is what’s known legally as a ‘private
association’…an ‘association’ whose members come together to further their shared
beliefs through what’s known as ‘electoral politics,’ and therefore they have
the right to pick ‘their’ representatives of ‘their’ own choosing…representatives
who then basically become what’s known as a ‘super delegates.’ And ‘super
delegates’ can and do vote for the candidate of their own choosing during any
round of balloting including on the first round. And with hundreds of delegates
and alternates already having signed online petitions to show their commitment
to stopping the phony Republican...Donald J. Trump...from securing the
nomination, those numbers can rightfully change the previously assumed outcome of who gets
nominated and who does not.
And for those who say that we comprising the #nevertrump
movement are trying to steal the nomination away from the man they
believe it
rightfully belongs to…I say you cannot steal something that no one has
yet secured as the convention has not even been held at this point in
time, hence not
one single delegate vote has been cast yet…so in no way has anything
been stolen
from anybody…especially from somebody who has done little to nothing to
unify
the party…period.
And uniting the party is critical especially in
going against the Clinton machine yet true conservatives, for the most part,
still will not support or vote for Trump. And those elected to public
office…those who do hold some sway over constituents opinions…are not rallying
around him either, no matter Comey’s report and recommendation, a sure sign
that Donald J. Trump will not beat Hillary Clinton in a head-to-head race.
And the poll numbers as I am
writing this do not bode well for Trump either as per the latest July 7th numbers.
RealClearPolitics showed Trump now trailing Hillary by 6.3 points. And Pew
Research shows Hillary at 51% to Trump’s 42%, a nine point spread. Reuters/Ipsos
shows Hillary at 44% to Trump‘s 33%, meaning Hillary is up by 11 points in that
poll. And while Rasmussen reports Hillary at 40% to Trump’s 42%, that is well
within the margin of error.
POLITICO’s battleground states polling showed Hillary
ahead of Trump by 4.3 points, with an Economist/YouGov poll showing Hillary up
four points over Trump, 43% to 39%. A CNN/ORC poll showed Hillary at 47% to 42%
over Trump with a CNBC poll showing Hillary at 40% to Trump’s 35%. And a
Monmouth poll was the worst for we Republicans having Hillary at 49% to Donald
Trump’s 41%.
Nationally, an ABC News/Washington Post poll, taken
in the last week of June, showed Hillary leading Trump by 12 points, 51% to 39%,
being her largest lead in any telephone survey since both candidates became
their parties' presumptive nominees. And while Hillary’s lead in the NBC
News/Wall Street Journal poll out last Sunday is smaller, coming in at 5
points, the fact is that Hillary has now led consecutively in the past 11 polls
conducted by live telephone interviewers.
And while a Quinnipiac University poll, like
Rasmussen, shows Hillary up by just 2 points, 42% to 40%...again within the
margin of error…it also showed that Hillary was opening up a lead in the key
state of Florida, basically now tying Trump in Ohio, and with the numbers also
basically tying Trump in Pennsylvania...meaning as she gains Trump loses.
And of critical note is that Trump is trailing
Hillary on a number of other key indicators, including candidate favorability,
which by the way is not good for either candidate what with a 34% favorability
for Trump and 37% favorability rating for Hillary. And it gets worse for both
as 58% of American voters say Trump will not be a good president with 53% saying
the same about Hillary Clinton.
And when the two leading third party candidates…Libertarian
Gary Johnson and the Green Party's Jill Stein…are added into the mix, Reuters/Ipsos
has Hillary at 42% to Trump's 33% with
Johnson at 8% and Stein at 4%, meaning Hillary is at +9 with 39% to Trump’s
37% of the national vote...with both Johnson and Stein (unfortunately) taking votes away from
the Republican totals not from the Democrats totals.
And these numbers are even more unsettling as they mirror
somewhat the much needed electoral college votes. As per a Thursday, July 7th FOX
News report, out of the 270 votes needed to secure the presidency, right now
even after the F.B.I. findings, Hillary Clinton still has a solid 227 electoral
votes when states considered solidly Democratic and leaning Democratic in the
November election are counted to Donald Trump’s 191 electoral votes when states
considered solidly Republican and leaning Republican are counted. But with 120
votes still being a toss-up and with more of those toss-up votes leaning Democratic
than they are Republican, the outcome with Trump as the nominee does not look
good.
And with numbers such as this…numbers that have been
pretty consistent over the past few months…numbers that reflect Trump’s not
being a true conservative…these are the numbers that gave momentum to the movement
to unbind the delegates…delegates who would then be free to choose a true
conservative that has a better chance of beating Hillary Clinton.
“We’re
not just people who said, ‘We’re disappointed. Our candidate wasn’t
nominated…We don’t
believe Trump “embodies the Republican Party principles”…We do not see him as
being the right person for the Republican candidate, and we also don’t feel
that, even if he was nominated, that he would be able to win."
-
Regina Thomson, co-founder of Free the Delegates 2016
Now for some basic facts about the Republican
National Convention itself as it relates to unbinding the delegates. First, from Monday,
July 18th through Thursday July21st, 2,472 Republican delegates will attend the
convention in Cleveland. Second, it’s the Rules Committee itself that decides
on the official guidelines…as in bylaws…that govern…if you will…the convention…with
said guidelines having to be ratified…or not ratified…by the delegates present.
Third, while most delegates are grassroots party activists who vigorously
campaigned to represent their congressional district or their state, there
always are a certain number of delegates set aside for so-called ‘party
insiders,’ including each state’s party chair and two Republican National
Committee (RNC) members. And it’s these 112 committee members who make the
rules…the bylaws…that govern the convention and who have the power to change or
not change existing rules at the convention…and in the case of Trump hopefully
will.
So while the convention can and usually does afford the nominee a
bounce in the polls…and Trump needs a convention poll bounce
big time as the majority of Republicans are still not in his corner...and with the harsh reality of numbers staring us in
the face, the con job perpetrated by the con man on the angry masses continues…a
con job that is going as planned…a con job that had Donald J. Trump put into
the race to assure a Hillary win. And I stand by my words no matter what those
in my party who support Trump have to say.
And the bottom line in all this is....Cleveland here we come!
And the bottom line in all this is....Cleveland here we come!
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
5 comments:
Polls are okay for Trump; he's ahead by 5 in Florida, the RCP national avg is Hillary up by 3.5%, if you take out the Reuters outlier. Trump very competitive in PA and OH. If you're trying to use polls to sway us, it's not effective. Any replacement of Trump, means the bottom falls out for a new nominee. Since Hillary, Cruz, Ryan and the rest of the Uniparty all agree on practically everything, a no-Trump GE means there is no point in voting.
Cimbri, it's delusional to think the polls are okay for Trump. He's in bad shape across the board. He cannot turn it around in 3 months, even if he did everything right. And we know by now, that Trump will be Trump. He cannot stop being stupid.
With another nominee, we can ignite the base, reset the race, and right the ship. We might not win, but we will have a better shot. Especially at saving the senate and house.
Plus, America needs to know NOW, that the GOP refuses to be defined by Trump's racism, misogyny, religious bigotry, and ignorance. That the GOP is NOT Trumpism.
Over 50% of Repubs want someone else. Trump is now losing educated white voters, something that has not happened in 50 years. The delegates need to save the GOP.
-Martha
1) a retweet of "Megyn is a bimbo" isn't mysogynist
2) "mexican judge" is not a racist term
3) we're losing some college educated because they're looking for a bailout. Yes, they heard Bernie loud and clear and want out of those loans. My suggestion is Trump offer them Chapter 7 or 13, nothing more. That would be very generous, especially since many of us paid our loans back, and our blue collar guys didn't get to enjoy years of beer parties and not having to work for a living.
Cimbri, do you defend Trump on everything? Is there nothing he does that offends you, or that you disagree with?
I find that Trump apologists simply refuse to acknowledge any of his many deficiencies. They really would not leave him if he shot someone on fifth ave.
It really is a cult of personality.
Also, the disgusting Kelly insult was not the only instance of Trump's misogyny. There are literally HUNDREDS of examples. He's just a pig when it comes to women. The fact that he hires some doesn't change anything.
-Martha
Martha,
I do get annoyed when he says, "I'll take care of the women" or some other generic liberal statement. Any candidate is going to make some gaffes, so I don't worry too much about it. Obviously it's not the Govt's place to take care of anyone except for seniors or physically disabled.
Post a Comment