Op-ed: What Do Vietnam and Gitmo Have in Common...a Traitor Named Obama
Op-ed:
What Do Vietnam and Gitmo Have in Common...a Traitor Named Obama By:
Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on
americanpbn.com
While Obama's minions are heralding him as the president who ended two
wars...never mind that he announced for the enemy and the world to hear
our 2011 withdrawal date from Iraq...only to then send over 4,000
soldiers back into harm's way...Obama was off to Vietnam on another leg
of his infamous and oh so traitorous 'apology tour.'
You know Vietnam...the war that Obama said was "the work of politicians"...was
the war that lingered on for 20 years...from 1955 to
1975...was the war that divided our nation like no other since the Civil
War...was the war full of media-generated misinformation that led many
to believe that America had lost the war when the reality is
that the war was lost by the South Vietnamese when Saigon (now known as
Ho Chi Minh City) fell on April 30, 1975, a full two years after our
troops 'officially' left behind that hell hole of heat, humidity, and of
course
of napalm and 'Agent Orange.'
Vietnam...a stalemate actually...saw 58,220 American casualties with
40,934 of our troops killed in action, and with 5,299 troops dying of
wounds received. Vietnam... where American civilian workers and
government contractors who stayed on for the two years after we
'officially' left accounting for the rest of that number.
Vietnam...which made enemies of our brave troops who returned home not
to accolades deserved but to the leers of those who met them with taunts
of being baby-killers and with in-their-face-hate, with
some even spat upon. And the cause of all this...yet another Democratic
president...this one being Lyndon B. Johnson...and a media hell-bent on
proudly showing their misrepresentation of the facts as to how the war
was actually going as they catered to and defended the anti-war movement
engulfing our country...engulfing our country doing more harm to
America than the war itself.
And while Obama was in communist-ruled Vietnam this week acquiescing, pandering,
and spewing to our once enemy that freedom of the press,
assembly, and religion, coupled together with freedom of speech and expression
"fuels" an economy, and "that is how some of our greatest companies
began," I guess he thinks what's good for Vietnam is not good for we here in
America as these are the very rights he and his administration are so
desperate to take away from 'We the People'...focusing instead on his
all-important, all-consuming, inane issue of who should go to the
bathroom where, and how best to take our guns away.
Addressing Vietnamese authorities on state television regarding their
still dismal human rights record, Obama said that while the U.S. is not
trying to "impose the American form of government on Vietnam," and that
"basic human rights are not a threat to Vietnam" nor to their communist
system of government, the country should still be more open to what he
called "scrutiny" in order for their country to grow much "stronger and more
prosperous" economically, which he claimed in turn would help start
companies that are good for the country...a country that will still
remain mired in communism, good companies or not, as long as its
one-party system remains the rule of the day.
And guess which company Obama had the audacity to cite to the Vietnamese people as an example of a 'good
company'...Facebook... the very company that is one of the biggest
violators of our freedom of speech. Something very wrong with this
picture I would say.
But the most grievous of all concerning Obama's visit to Vietnam was
this past Monday's lifting of a decades- long embargo on the sale of
lethal weapons to the communist country...the country where over 58,000
of our men and women were killed. In a joint news conference in Hanoi
with Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang, Obama said that the lifting of
the embargo was part of a "deeper defense cooperation" with the country
while at the same time denying what some have hinted at as being a
way...or so Obama thinks...to counter...to stop...China's ever-growing
muscle flexing throughout the southeast Asia region...a region where
China has recently tried to claim territory in the South China Sea that
actually belongs to others...including claims by Vietnam...and where
they have been building artificial islands and military-grade
installations on some of the atolls and reefs they control and claim.
Continuing by saying...with a straight face I might add...that it was
his goal to "continue normalizing" relations...where have we heard
those words before...between the United States and Vietnam... meaning to
put relations between us and our former enemy on a 'supposed' equal
footing...which is a so very wrong line of thinking...as well as to
build upon 2001’s bilateral trade deal and Vietnam’s signing onto the
U.S.-led Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)...the very partnership most
American's oppose yet a partnership that would serve Vietnam and their
interests well.
And Obama wants to do away with said embargo "based on ideological
division between our two countries." And these words mimic almost to a
tee his nefarious 'very bad' deal with Iran...and we all know how that
deal has been working out now don't we. And like with Iran and other
countries with dismal human rights records, Obama spoke that sales of
said weapons, along with strategic information, would be evaluated on a
"case-by-case" basis.
You mean one weapon or one bit of information for one political
prisoner...is that Obama's definition of case-by-case...just saying.
"China should think twice over anything they can do to Vietnam or the
South China Sea," said. Nguyen Ngoc Truong, president of Vietnam's
Center for Strategic Studies and International Development after Obama
spoke. "They (China) should get the message," but if truth be told any
'message' sent by Obama has been proven to be good for those not truly
our friends while traitorous to these United States.
And what do we get by the lifting of this embargo...just like with
the Iran 'very bad' nuclear deal we get nothing...nothing..because
Vietnam needs us more than we need them especially regarding their dispute with China over
the above mentioned contested islands and where Obama is playing a very dangerous
game...a game where he hopes that the arming of Vietnam will turn them
completely against China and allied with us...something that is not
likely to happen even with the island dispute, at least not in a way that is
beneficial to the U.S.
So now we sit and wait while Obama continues his 'apology tour' in
Japan...we wait for the final ramifications and fallout of his visit to
Vietnam to make themselves known. And
rest assured it will not be pretty and will end up in some way, some
how, hurting our Vietnam vets in the end.
Now as for Obama's newest deal...aiding and abetting the enemy as far
as I'm concerned...a deal to transfer two-dozen* more long-held Gitmo
detainees...the "worst of the worst" according to one anonymous
official...all I can say is that this most miserable and pathetic excuse of a
president continues to go directly against the wishes of both Congress
and 'We the People' who want Gitmo to remain open. And why...because the
simple fact is that if these bastards stay in Gitmo we would not have
to worry yet again about some of them joining up with the 30% or more
who have already returned to terrorist activities...activities which
including the killing of American troops.
In fact, according to a report
issued earlier this year by the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, the number of detainees released from Gitmo who have
"reengaged in terrorism" has doubled since July 2015, translating to
date into 118 out of the 676 detainees released who have been confirmed
to have "reengaged" in terrorist acts since 2009...and that includes
three from the infamous 5-for-1 trade...where five Gitmo-held Taliban
leaders were traded for one American traitor...Bowe Bergdahl.
And now Obama wants to transfer two-dozen more terrorists...and yes that is
what these so-called' detainees actually are...to half a dozen mostly
Middle East countries before the end of July... countries who might not be able to keep them locked up or even be able to successfully track them. And while the list of
these countries has not yet been released just know that some if not all
of these countries are surely not America's friends as they willingly
turn a blind eye to terrorist groups operating and/or recruiting from within their
borders. And while all those now scheduled to be transferred have been
approved for said transfer either through the 2010 internal review
process or as a result of the quasi-parole hearings known as Periodic
Review Boards, some of those detainees have not yet received the needed
certification by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter as required by law
before officially notifying Congress.
But that is of no importance to Obama what with his having only eight
months left to come through with his promise to close Gitmo...and we
know this is one promise he intends to fulfill solely because it aids
his blood brethren.
And what a promise it is...a promise drawn straight from the devil's playbook...a
promise that has Obama intending to transfer all the remaining
detainees who can be safely transferred to willing host countries and to
be done so post-haste. Also, Obama intends to charge and try as many
remaining detainees as he can through the military justice system, and
for the few remaining who are too dangerous to transfer or who for
whatever reason will not be charged by the military, Obama wants those
men placed in maximum security prisons here in the U.S. for indefinite
detention calling them enemy combatants. And this will have you shaking
your head in disbelief as Obama wants any new captures to be brought
here to the U.S. to be charged in U.S. federal courts even though those
captured in a time of war should be tried, convicted, and sentenced at
the military level not at the civilian.
“It's a recruiting tool for those who wish to do us harm," Obama
spokesman Eric Schultz continues to say as he tries to justify Obama's wanting to close Gitmo, but
according to Thomas Joscelyn, senior fellow at the Foundation for
Defense of Democracies, Obama's laser-focused drive to close Gitmo is
“all about ideologically driven policy" ...a policy that shows
where
his true allegiances lie...and we all know those very allegiances are
not
with America. And the fact is that those engaging in terrorist
activities are more likely to do so because of their general but all
consuming hate for Israel,
for Jews, for Christians, and specifically because of the Israeli/
Palestinian conflict, than they are because of the prison camp known as
Gitmo.
"I don’t want to pass this problem onto the next president, whoever it
is,” Obama also keeps saying, but saying so requires the person saying
it to be more than a bit altruistic which we all know Obama is not. “And
if as a nation, we don’t deal with this now, when will we deal with
it?” he continues to ask, but if truth be told there remains an easy
solution...leave Gitmo open and operational and no future president will
have to deal with it...and if other nations have a problem with that
well that's just too damn bad as
the safety
of America and 'We the People' trumps anything any other nation thinks or says.
So what do Vietnam and Gitmo have in common...a traitor named Barack
HUSSEIN Obama...a man who would rather do for the enemy and those not
truly America's friend than do for the nation he swore to serve and
protect...but I guess when one's fingers are crossed behind one's back
promises made mean not a thing especially when they're made by a man
whose allegiance truly does lie with those out to kill us all.
______________________________________________
* Out of the original 800 detainees only 80 currently remain at Gitmo, which opened in 2002
No comments:
Post a Comment