Should the Death Penalty Be On The Table For Bergdahl?

Betrayal: Last year, the president claimed he only freed five Taliban leaders to free "POW" Bowe Bergdahl, whom he portrayed as a hero. But now the Army says Bergdahl's a deserter. We smell a rat, and it's not just Bergdahl.

The Army on Wednesday charged Sgt. Bergdahl with desertion and endangering the safety of a command, which carries a life prison term.

The findings of the military's six-month investigation corroborate an internal 2009 Army report that found Bergdahl had a history of walking off his post and more than likely deserted. That's why the Pentagon never listed him as a POW.

The report said he shipped his laptop back home to Idaho, and left a note expressing his disillusionment with the war, before ending up in the arms of the Taliban.

Obama had access to this intelligence long before he made his Taliban deal. So why did he trade a known deserter — and likely enemy sympathizer, if not collaborator — for five enemy commanders that he acknowledged posed a national security risk? And why did he glorify Bergdahl as a war hero?

To justify the release from Gitmo of five hardened terrorists who would never have been released otherwise and to help close down Gitmo. This was all part of a political strategy.

Obama happens to share the agenda of Bergdahl and his Taliban-bearded father, who was an antiwar activist long before his son played Taliban hostage. We know that from their emails and tweets. Bob Bergdahl promised the Taliban that he'd continue to fight to get all terrorists freed from Gitmo after the deal was finalized. He even prayed that American soldiers would be punished for killing Afghans.

Read the rest HERE.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.