Saturday, July 5, 2014

More than Two-Thirds of Today's Youth would not Qualify for Military Service

More than two-thirds of America's youth would fail to qualify for military service because of physical, behavioral or educational shortcomings, posing challenges to building the next generation of soldiers even as the U.S. draws down troops from conflict zones.
The military deems many youngsters ineligible due to obesity, lack of a high-school diploma, felony convictions and prescription-drug use for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. But others are now also running afoul of standards for appearance amid the growing popularity of large-scale tattoos and devices called ear gauges that create large holes in earlobes.
A few weeks ago, Brittany Crippen said she tried to enlist in the Army, only to learn that a tattoo of a fish on the back of her neck disqualified her. Determined to join, the 19-year-old college student visited a second recruiting center in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and was rejected again.
Apologetic recruiters encouraged her to return after removing the tattoo, a process she was told would take about year. "I was very upset," Ms. Crippen said.
The military services don't keep figures on how many people they turn away. But the Defense Department estimates 71% of the roughly 34 million 17- to 24-year-olds in the U.S. would fail to qualify to enlist in the military if they tried, a figure that doesn't even include those turned away for tattoos or other cosmetic issues. Meanwhile, only about 1% of youths are both "eligible and inclined to have a conversation with us" about military service, according to Major Gen. Allen Batschelet, commanding general of U.S. Army Recruiting Command.
Read the rest of the story HERE.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.


4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bergdahl was admitted under more lenient standards, even though he was known to have issues. Sending a guy like that to a war zone is iffy at best.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

I"m glad to see standards returning to the military. I know when I served, I served with the best of the best. Squared away in all area's of their lives. I am glad to see even 'minor' things like excessive tattoo's, ear gages and such, being winnowed out as potential soliders and sailors. It shows lack of character when they mutilate their bodies like that.

Anonymous said...

The military has changed. So have the expectations, qualifications, rules and regulations. No surprise there!!

Anonymous said...

Romney had the right idea during Viet nam.