Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Is Rand Paul's Balancing Act between Libertarians and Mainstream Republicans a Winning Strategy?

When tea-party activists rallied last weekend in Kentucky, their home-state hero, Sen. Rand Paul, wasn't invited. The event featured the tea-party candidate running for the Senate, while Mr. Paul is backing the incumbent, Sen. Mitch McConnell. 
But leaders of FreedomWorks, the conservative group that organized the rally, still view Mr. Paul as an ally. In February, he joined their lawsuit over government phone surveillance. "That makes clear his willingness to shake up the political establishment," said FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe.
That is just one example of the balancing act Mr. Paul is attempting as he prepares for a likely White House bid in 2016. Trying to leap from tea-party firebrand to GOP standard-bearer, the freshman senator is courting the party leaders and fundraisers crucial to a national campaign, while mostly keeping faith with the libertarian base that made him a Republican Party phenom.
A test comes on April 25, when Spencer Zwick, the national finance chairman for Mitt Romney's presidential campaigns, is slated to introduce top donors in Boston to Mr. Paul. While some fundraisers say Mr. Paul's resistance to the use of military force abroad disqualifies him from leading the GOP, others are intrigued by his efforts to grow the party by reaching out to young and minority audiences. 
Support from donors who backed Mr. Romney, a defense hawk, would provide more evidence that Republicans are coming to favor a more restrained U.S. military role. Wall Street Journal/NBC News polling this year shows that members of each party in nearly equal numbers would look less favorably, rather than more favorably, on a candidate who believes the U.S. should do more to resolve conflicts around the world.
Read the rest of the story HERE and view a related video below:



If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm skeptical, but open to being convinced. He's impressive so far, and if he is able to achieve the coalition he's looking for, then good for him. But he still had some giant red flags for me.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

This is it exactly:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/375765/rand-pauls-foreign-policy-situation-room-or-dorm-room-rich-lowry

-Martha

cimbri said...

I wouldn't mind seeing Rand Paul, in order to break from all the poisonous politics of the past 15 to 20 years. We need a fresh vision from a new president with a different ideology and outlook.