Saturday, December 28, 2013

Mike Huckabee Endorses and Cuts Ad For S.C. Senator Lindsey Graham For Upcoming Primary Battle

I can't for the life of me understand what the f--- he was thinking when he agreed to do this. As far as I'm concerned, this is more evidence that he has no intention of running for President in 2016.



If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.


16 comments:

RomneyMan said...

A good decision.he's not interested- like some- of making every decision he makes a political one.

IN fact, he can do what ever he wants. He has a firm base which won't be shifting. So, whatever he does/endorses, if he runs (and I agree, I don't think he will), every vote he gathers is one less for your golden boy, and one more for a candidate who might just have a chance in a general.

Right Wingnut said...

His base is "firm," but not all that big.

http://www.forum.hucksarmy.com/search-hucksarmy.php?search_id=active_topics

Not only is his fan site a ghost town, despite the phony 2016 buzz, but the Huckaboosters have been in hiding on other sites that have discussed his 2016 comments as well.

He has enough support in Iowa to cause problems for others, but not enough elsewhere to win the nomination. He probably knows this. I don't think he could win Iowa at this stage.

CRUZ COUNTRY said...

RW is absolutely correct about this endorsement/ad being more proof that The Huckster is NOT running in 2016, unless he's planning on competing with Jeb, Ryan and the ill-tempered fatso from New Jersey for the RINO vote.

Anonymous said...

Cruz country, I prefer you keep your remarks civil to Martha, but when you start making remarks about my church, I will ask Bosman to intervene. How dare you? I don't think I have ever been so offended on this site. If you can't apologize and behave better, take yourself elsewhere.

AZ

Right Wingnut said...

AZ, with all due respect, why do you not say something to Martha regarding her constant harassment of CC? I doubt he would attack her in that manner if she could control herself.

CRUZ COUNTRY said...

AZ is "OFFENDED" - LOL - she sounds just like a typical lib. Reminds me of the libs who cried and cried and cried about Phil Robertson's recent remarks. Some cry-babies never grow up.

CRUZ COUNTRY said...

RW - Martha's "constant harassment" of me? That's one way of describing it. I call it STALKING and FLAMING. But, as she's already discovered, I hit back TEN TIMES AS HARD as I get hit. Sooner or later, she'll grow weary of her daily BEAT-DOWN, and she'll run away with her tail tucked firmly between her legs.

Right Wingnut said...

Just an FYI, Bosman has almost no interest in intervening in these situations. But I have been given the green light to delete the comments. In some cases, I'll probably just leave them up. This thread was going nowhere anyway, due to the lack of interest in anything related to Huckabee. Martha is putting her fellow Mormons in a tight spot with her unnecessary attacks. I don't want to appear as though I'm condoning the retaliations, but it's time for some of these people to take a stand against Martha's actions. Is there some sort of LDS code that states that you should refrain from confronting a fellow Mormon? Because the silence on this over the past few months is deafening.

Right Wingnut said...

Those comments were not deleted by me.

I respectfully request that Martha cease and desist these attacks on my threads.

Right Wingnut said...

I just deleted Martha's comment. Now lets drop it once and for all.

Anonymous said...

What in the heck is everyone talking about? I made one comment to CC/NH/Pedophile Rapist defender. I said that it was funny for him to call someone else ill-tempered. (seeing as how he has anger management problems.)

Now if that one comment was deleted, no big deal. I don't care. But if there were other comments made with my name, I would have a problem with that!

From what I get, CC/NH/Rapist Defender made some bad comments about Mormonism, which were deleted, and which don't surprise me in the least, considering the source.

So to recap, I only made one comment yesterday. I would not put it past CC/NH/Rapist defender to sign my name to nasty comments.

-Martha
-Martha

Anonymous said...

CC/NH/Rapist Defender, you are a lightweight who defends rapists. I'm not quaking in my shoes, lol.

You are your own biggest problem, not me.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

RW, CC/NH/Rapist defender made his own bed. I'm not his problem, he is. He defended a pedophile rapist right here in this site. And a LOT of other nasty things. I consider him a scourge to this site. No one should talk to him. And the fact that you defend him, while deleting me for merely reminding people of what he did, is very disturbing. Yet, unsurprising.

I don't give a flip if you delete me. I'm never going to stop telling the truth about our angry pedophile defender.

-Martha

Right Wingnut said...

OK, Martha.

You win.

From now on, I'll let you two sort things out on your own.

Good luck.

Anonymous said...

Okay. :-)

It's probably a good thing I didn't see what he wrote.

As I see it there are three headaches for Bosman on this site: Newark, me and Romneyman. I admit that.

-Martha

Jerry D. Woods said...

"I haven't endorsed Lindsay. Last year, I voiced an ad thanking him for support of Israel. It was not an endorsement for reelection. I don't plan to endorse anyone in SC Senate race in the primary. Will certainly help in the general. Obviously, LIndsay's people are using the TY ad and treating it like an endorsement, but neither the PAC nor I personally have endorsed in SC." -- Mike Huckabee