Sunday, November 3, 2013

Report: Team Romney's Christie vetting was a disaster


Team Romney wanted Chris Christie on the ticket, but he failed the vetting process miserably. Imagine that.

This likely isn't the half of it. I fully expect the MSM to keep Christie's closet full of skeletons close to the vest in the hopes that the GOP will be dumb enough to nominate this jackass.

Some highlights:

 ....He was also a fundraising dynamo, but he and his staff were overbearing and hard to work with, demanding in ways that would have been unthinkable from any other surrogate. Months earlier, Christie had banned Romney from raising money in New Jersey until Christie had given the O.K. to do so—a move Romney found galling, like something out of The Sopranos. Are you kidding me, Mitt thought. He’s going to do that? There were plenty of New Jersey donors who’d given money to Mitt in 2008; now Christie was trying to impose a gag order on talking to them? “He sounds like the biggest asshole in the world,” Stevens griped to his partner, Russ Shriefer. More recently, Trenton insisted on private jets, lavish spreads of food, space for a massive entourage. Romney ally Wayne Berman looked at the bubble around Christie and thought, He’s not the President of the United States, you know.....

 ......Chronically behind schedule, Christie made a habit of showing up late to Romney fundraising events. In May he was so tardy to a donor reception at the Grand Hyatt New York that Mitt wound up taking the stage to speak before Christie arrived. When the Jersey governor finally made his grand entrance, it was as if Mitt had been his warm-up act.....

 ....The list of questions Myers and her team had for Christie was extensive and troubling. More than once, Myers reported back that Trenton’s response was, in effect, Why do we need to give you that piece of information? Myers told her team, We have to assume if they’re not answering, it’s because the answer is bad.....

 ....The vetters were stunned by the garish controversies lurking in the shadows of his record. There was a 2010 Department of Justice inspector general’s investigation of Christie’s spending patterns in his job prior to the governorship, which criticized him for being “the U.S. attorney who most often exceeded the government [travel expense] rate without adequate justification” and for offering “insufficient, inaccurate, or no justification” for stays at swank hotels like the Four Seasons. There was the fact that Christie worked as a lobbyist on behalf of the Securities Industry Association at a time when Bernie Madoff was a senior SIA official—and sought an exemption from New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act. There was Christie’s decision to steer hefty government contracts to donors and political allies like former Attorney General John Ashcroft, which sparked a congressional hearing. There was a defamation lawsuit brought against Christie arising out of his successful 1994 run to oust an incumbent in a local Garden State race. Then there was Todd Christie, the Governor’s brother, who in 2008 agreed to a settlement of civil charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission in which he acknowledged making “hundreds of trades in which customers had been systematically overcharged.” (Todd also oversaw a family foundation whose activities and purpose raised eyebrows among the vetters.) And all that was on top of a litany of glaring matters that sparked concern on Myers’ team: Christie’s other lobbying clients, his investments overseas, the YouTube clips that helped make him a star but might call into doubt his presidential temperament, and the status of his health..... 


Puffer Fish
....Four nights later, on July 19, Myers’ team put the finishing touches on the Pufferfish vetting dossier. Included was a DVD with some of Christie’s most outlandish or unnerving YouTube hits: his castigating a pro-gay-marriage New Jersey assemblyman as “numb nuts,” his angrily berating a constituent while chasing him down the Seaside Heights boardwalk, brandishing an ice cream cone. But the main event was the 35-page written report titled “Chris Christie memo 71912 FINAL.”.....

....On Todd Christie’s securities-fraud settlement: “[Governor] Christie has been asked to disclose whether Todd Christie incurred any monetary or other penalty as a result of the SEC/NYSE action. If Christie’s possible selection is to move forward, this item should be obtained.” On Christie’s defamation lawsuit: “Christie has been asked to provide the terms of the settlement of this matter. If Christie’s possible selection is to move forward, this item should be obtained.” On Christie’s household help: “Christie has been asked to provide the names and documented status of all domestic employees. This material has not been received. If Christie’s possible selection is to move forward, these items should be obtained.” On Christie’s lobbying clients: “Christie has provided only one of the twelve or so [public disclosure] filings made [in the time he was a lobbyist] … If Christie’s possible selection is to move forward, these items should be obtained.”....

 ....Then there was this: “In response to the questionnaire, Governor Christie indicates that he has no health issues that would hinder him from serving as the vice-presidential nominee. Published reports indicate that Christie suffers from asthma and was briefly hospitalized last year after he suffered an asthma attack. He is also obese and has indicated that he struggles with his weight. ‘The weight exacerbates everything,’ he is quoted as saying. Christie has been asked to provide a detailed medical report. Christie has been asked to provide a copy of all medical records from his most recent physical examination. If Christie’s possible selection is to move forward, this item should be obtained.”....

Read it all here

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.


47 comments:

RomneyMan said...

Yes, all this (manufactured?) stuff must be horrendous for his re-election ratings.

Let us have a look: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2013/governor/nj/new_jersey_governor_christie_vs_buono-3411.html

oh, perhaps not.

RomneyMan said...

lol, and instead, one takes the *expert* decisions form those who conclude that "

The overwhelming consensus was for Ryan. He was young, telegenic, Irish Catholic, with blue collar appeal, and he might put his state in play. He would rouse the base and sharpen the policy contrast with Obama." lol

Read more: Double Down Excerpt: Mitt Romney Feared Chris Christie's Baggage | TIME.com http://swampland.time.com/2013/11/02/the-hunt-for-pufferfish/#ixzz2jaqcmx59

Machtyn said...

Christie, if he thinks of running for POTUS in the GOP primary, he's going to find a very tough road to travel. He *might* have a New England lock, but he won't get the rest of the country.

Right Wingnut said...

Romney is on Meet The Press right now, and didn't deny these claims. Then he turned around and gave Christie a plug for 2016! "They don't come better than Chris Christie." Unbelievable.

RomneyMan said...

lol...they said what they found would have destroyed him (if they had had Christie as an opponent in a primary) in a primary, and he still thinks he'd be good for a general election?? My oh my.

Right Wingnut said...

More: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/11/02/Report-Garish-Controversies-About-Chris-Christie-s-Past-as-Lobbyist-in-Book-Drudge-ready-Nightmare

Right Wingnut said...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2013/11/romney-they-dont-come-better-than-chris-christie-176581.html?hp=l1

Anonymous said...

This is all pretty funny. I actually wanted Romney to choose either Ryan or Christie for VP, even though I really didn't like a lot of things about Christie such as his propensity to shoot from the hip, and to insult his constituents. Hindsight is 20/10 though.

Suffice it to say, Christie is going to have a rough go in 2016. We now know a lot more unflattering things about the big man's character. Things that are going to overshadow his political talent.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

20/20.

Romney made the right choice in Paul Ryan and he remains my number one choice right now for 2016.


RW, I didn't read your links yet, but I fail to see the problem.

-Martha

Right Wingnut said...

Martha,

The Breitbart link is just more about the Christie vetting.

The second link is Romney gushing about how great Christie is. If you're OK with that, there's no hope for you. It's OK to be critical at times. Some of Palin's endorsements were head scratchers too, like Orrin Hatch. You don't have to walk in lock step. We all know you don't like Christie.

RomneyMan said...

"Romney made the right choice in Paul Ryan and he remains my number one choice right now for 2016."

I really think there comes a time when someone needs to really take a long hard look and, basically give up. By that comment, you have officially reached that point.

No words can really be said on that remark.
For once, speechless.

Right Wingnut said...

Martha,

What did Paul Ryan add to the ticket from an electoral standpoint? Do you believe Romney would have done better, or worse without Ryan?

I'll hang up and listen.....

RomneyMan said...

I really don't know if it was meant as a joke? Someone tell me for sanity it was a joke remark. YOu know how humour can be hard sometimes to come across online. I'll accept if it was.

Again: "Romney made the right choice in Paul Ryan and he remains my number one choice right now for 2016."

It's just too awesome to be real.

RomneyMan said...

I've got to stick that on a word document. I can't go through life maybe forgetting that one lol

"Romney made the right choice in Paul Ryan and he remains my number one choice right now for 2016."

Anonymous said...

RW, I don't know. The only thing I know is that Ryan was probably the best choice among all of the possibilities. Everyone had drawbacks. So, no, I don't think Romney would have done any better with anyone else. I also I don't think veeps make a huge difference anyway, and I certainly don't think Ryan hurt Romney. It's nice to think that someone can be a game-changer, but that's not reality normally. I think Palin both hurt and helped McCain if that is possible, so she was probably a net even. So was Ryan, although a much less controversial figure.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

RW, okay, I will look at the link of Romney 'gushing' though I doubt he did. Romney is just a polite person, that's all, and doesn't speak ill of fellow R's.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

Okay, watched it. That was def not gushing. Just Mitt being Mitt, being generous and honest.

-Martha

Right Wingnut said...

As for Palin......you know the millions of conservatives who stayed home in 2012? They probably would have sat it out in 2008 had she not been there. Sure, there were some who used her as an excuse for not voting GOP, but she was a net gain. McCain even admits that he would have lost by more without her. Steve Schmidt too.

RomneyMan said...

"Romney made the right choice in Paul Ryan and he remains my number one choice right now for 2016."

He's the Dems + 10 million illegals #1 choice too, or near as dammit.

Right Wingnut said...

Mitt's praise of Christie droned on for far too long for my liking.

Anonymous said...

RW, no I don't know the millions of conservatives who stayed home in 2012. I don't think it happened. It's a myth. Plus I don't think Palin was a net gain. But no one really knows. Not even McCain or Schmidt. Plus, McCain would never admit it if he hurt the campaign.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

if SHE hurt the campaign. Sorry another typo.

Right Wingnut said...

Schmidt would....

Right Wingnut said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Right Wingnut said...

Martha, when you see that Romney barely matched McCain's vote total, despite a population increase of 10 million, and despite Romney winning indies, while McCain got crushed in that voting block, one has to conclude that millions of McCain voters from 2008 stayed home. I know you're smart, and can see that, even though you don't want to admit it.

Joel2013 said...

Unlike others Romney does not openly criticize others in the party very often. The exception would be in the middle of a campaign debate and even then he is not a flame-thrower but meticulous in his statements. McCain lost the 2008 race the minute he made the mistake of choosing Palin over Romney. Palin brought nothing to the ticket. She was a nobody. And yet despite this blunder I voted for our candidate, I didn't stay home and sulk like spoiled children like the so-called squatters. I could care less who they are and/or who they like, they are not patriots nor worthy of my respect.

Anonymous said...

RW, you're going to have to show some statistics, because I've never read that millions of McCain voters stayed home in 2012.

-Martha

Jrterrier said...

Romney was in a no-win situation when asked about Christie. If Romney had equivocated in any way, the media would have made a big deal & belittled Romney about still being sore because Christie hugged Obama on the days leading up to the election. Romney just stated the truth -- that Christie is winning in a blue state.

As far as Ryan, I liked the pick. It showed that Romney was looking at someone who was knowledgeable & hard-working & looking for solutions. I think they hoped he would be able to help carry WI and even FL (because of his mother).

It wouldn't have mattered who he picked because of the media & the Obama campaign's shameless lies. If the media had only been 1/4 as critical of the Obama administration as it is being now with Obamacare, Romney would have won. And I still believe there was widescale voter fraud in the cities (Cleveland, Philly, Detroit, etc)

Right Wingnut said...

Martha, the articles were posted everywhere. Including here. If you didn't see them, it's because you chose to ignore them. You'll have to dig them up yourself.

Right Wingnut said...

Actually, there's a possibility that Romney might be sabotaging Christie through his aids. If so, it's brilliant! It kind of sounds like it, unless it's just a rogue aid. read this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/review-double-down-on-the-2012-election-by-mark-halperin-and-john-heilemann/2013/11/01/8bf4f050-3fdd-11e3-a751-f032898f2dbc_story.html

Joel2013 said...

Absolutely he was a better choice in 2008 than Palin was. Palin was a nobody then. She remains a nobody. And it's not to difficult for me to state my points without using profanity. On the other hand it demeans your credibility and makes it appear you cannot justify your points. Not the first time it's happened unfortunately.

Right Wingnut said...

I will take back every negative thing I ever said about Romney if it comes out that he did this to take Christie out.

Anonymous said...

RW, There are contracting stories that were written concerning 2012 voting stats. You are simply choosing to believe the ones that agree with you. I believe Pablo posted some links a few months ago that debunked some of the commonly held beliefs about 2012.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

The reason I am skeptical about it because why on earth would a real conservative stay home in 2012? That just doesn't make a bit of sense.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

So no, I don't believe millions of conservatives stayed home. It's crazy talk.

-Martha

Right Wingnut said...

Martha, Just look at the math for cryin out loud. It's right there. I could spend 15 minutes looking up the articles, giving you the exit poll data, and laying out the math for you, but it's just not worth the time. Been there done that.

Joel2013 said...

If in fact people stayed at home then they are fools. It's ignorance that caused people to stay at home and not cast their vote. Inspiration cannot replace ignorance. Simply look at the fools who helped re-elect the incumbent.

Right Wingnut said...

Romney is my new hero if he's behind his. Seriously.

....Halperin and Heilemann make abundant use of a vice-presidential vetting file dropped into their hands by someone in Romney’s orbit to illuminate secrets about the governor. Delivering the documents to the authors was a stunning breach of political decorum that can only be read as a giant middle finger at Christie and his aides.....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/review-double-down-on-the-2012-election-by-mark-halperin-and-john-heilemann/2013/11/01/8bf4f050-3fdd-11e3-a751-f032898f2dbc_story.html

Anonymous said...

RW, here is a link Pablo provided that says it is a myth that Romney didn't match McCain numbers.

-Martha

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/gop-turnout-myths-and-reality/

Right Wingnut said...

I've saw that when Pablo posted it, and responded at the time. Written by a rino Romney supporter. Just do the math, Martha.

Anonymous said...

RW It was the math no matter who wrote it,lol.

Martha

Right Wingnut said...

Martha, They got roughly the same number of overall votes. Romney won indies by 5, while McCain got crushed with indies, and the population grew by 10 million. If everyone who voted for McCain in 2008 showed up to vote for Romney, he would have netted millions more total votes. It's not that complicated.

Right Wingnut said...

McCain voters + indies who voted for Obama in 2008 + additional votes from increased population should = several million more votes than what McCain got.

The exact number is debatable, but it's certainly in the millionS.

Right Wingnut said...

I'm not excusing those who sat home on their ass. I voted for Romney.

RomneyMan said...

same liberal media in '00 and '04

Did the Dems win them elections too?

Anonymous said...

Pity, RWN, McCain did not vet the arctic bimbo as extensive as Romney vetted Christie. We might not have her shrill voice on every subject she knows nothing about.
Ellie.
:)

Anonymous said...

Ellie. Still the bitter jealous witch we all loathe. :)