Saturday, October 5, 2013

Obamacare: Concerns over the Security of the Obamacare Data Hub

A provision in ObamaCare requiring medical providers to switch from paper patient charts to electronic records is intended to reduce costs and improve care. But privacy advocates fear the transition is too fast for security measures to keep pace. 
"The thing I worry about is not that we are doing it, but that we're doing it without the right safeguards," said Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "We have been giving (medical providers) incentives to move into the electronic-health-records era. But we haven't been giving them enough guidance on how they're supposed to do it." 
Tien is concerned more specifically with the timeline outpacing privacy laws that keep pharmaceutical companies and other entities outside hospitals and doctor's offices from exploiting the information for commercial use. 
"Like any other kind of customer data, it gets bought and sold and you have no idea where it went," Tien said. 
And cyber-security experts say consolidating vast amounts of patient information in large databases creates a big target for high-tech thieves, domestically and abroad. 
Daimon Geopfert -- a security and privacy expert with the McGladrey consulting group -- compares the situation to a group of banks with tunnels to the same vault. 
"The security of that master vault, in many cases, is as insecure as the least secure of those banks," he said. 
While advanced attacks do occur, Geopfert said, databases commonly encounter breaches caused by a single employee inadvertently exposing a computer to the same type of malicious software, or "malware," those everyday users routinely encounter through their daily Internet use. 
The malware can go unnoticed for months as it sends spam emails, infecting other computers on the system. And once the hackers realize they've infiltrated a hospital or doctor's office, patient records become an attractive target, according to Geopfert. 
"A lot of the breaches we run into start from something very trivial," he said.
Read the rest of the story HERE and view a related video below:



If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.


4 comments:

RomneyMan said...

The lengths and drivel pele will go in the never ending quest to deny people health cover.

What next- wipe out all of those with pre exitings off the face of the earth?

It might be hard to take, but (and prepare yourself here): The days of insurance companies ripping people off for a fast buck are gladly coming to an end.

The say ACA will be the end of insurance companies ovr time (ingers crossed eh). However, like Romney said in the 1st debate (about medicare)- (paraphrased) if Gov can do it better than the private sector they have nothing to worry about.

Use that principle in reverse.

Like I said- I apologize that more people are going to have health cover.

No selling the family heirlooms (is that word ok AZ?) to pay for that treatment that the insurance companies previously discriminated you over....



RomneyMan said...

* people in the first sentence above- not the great soccer (is that word okay there AZ?) star Pele!

BOSMAN said...

The bottom line on the security at the Data hub is that it's security is unable to keep up with the ongoing technical advancements in hacking...Nice to know huh. As you and your doctors submit online just about everything a criminal will need to know to successfully take over ones identity. These barely trained (if at all) navigator lackeys manning the intake of data are accidents/security breaches waiting to happen.

PUNCHLINE: The security at the data hubs has not been verified by independent sources. Just take Big Brother's word on this that everything is fine and your information is safe.......and I have a bridge to sell you..

FirestarOkie said...

Data and tech should be decentralized. You get your files from your doctor now and take them to the hospital or next provider. Why can't that happen now? We have "Jump Drives" etc and if providers had standardized "standalone systems" isolated from internet access with the best in firewall to clean incoming data. BUT you see that the GOVERNMENT really wants CONTROL. This is self evident by invasive questions THEY can use to control YOU. "Do you have guns in the home?" "Do you have a history or using anti depressants or have a family history of mental problems?" "Do you take Ambien for sleep?" If medical was what they were after "the poor" could go to the doctor get a TAX refund credit to the doctor and be responsible for their own debt. NO INSURANCE INVOLVED and with a stake in the game no fraud. Government is invasive. Insurance drives prices UP. Change it.