Thursday, September 12, 2013

Why Doesn't Obama have a "Red Line" for for beheadings, raping girls, killing Alawites and cleansing Christians?

H/T Rightscoop
President Obama, John Kerry, John McCain and Lindsey Graham are all peddling the anti-Syrian government line and now they have a beloved “red line,” whereby they can assist the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood and various al-Qaeda terrorist groups. Of course, when Carla del Ponte stated earlier this year that the United Nations believed that terrorist forces had used chemical weapons; then, of course, this was conveniently ignored by America, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Similarly, it appears that Obama, Kerry, McCain and Graham don’t believe in a red line when it applies to al-Qaeda affiliates, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and other terrorist forces.
This reality means that unlike the doubts which remain over the chemical issue – the stark reality of vast numbers of videos showing barbaric massacres by al-Qaeda affiliates and the FSA are realities. In other words, for Obama, Kerry, McCain and Graham, and many others who are assisting sectarian and terrorist forces; they don’t have any red lines for cleansing Christians, killing Alawites, children being killed for blasphemy, raping women, slaughtering the Shia, beheading civilians, killing Syrian women who refuse to marry jihadists and so forth. Indeed, the so-called opposition can even kidnap Christian bishops and kill Christian priests because nothing stops America, France and the United Kingdom from providing propaganda for the FSA and various al-Qaeda forces.
[...] 
Images of the FSA and al-Qaeda affiliates teaching children to behead Syrian soldiers and partaking in murdering pro-government civilians aren’t deemed to be red lines. Cleansing Alawites, the Shia and Christians also isn’t deemed to be a red line. Likewise, car bombings, beheading anyone deemed pro-government and killing children on video also appears to be acceptable. Indeed, even when the UN pointed the finger at anti-Syrian government forces for using chemical weapons this also wasn’t deemed to be a red line. 
Carla del Ponte, UN human rights investigator, pointed the finger at terrorist forces when another false flag was raised. She stated several months ago that “We still have to deepen our investigation, verify and confirm (the findings) through new witness testimony, but according to what we have established so far, it is at the moment opponents of the regime who are using sarin gas.”
In other words, any barbarity committed by various al-Qaeda affiliates, the FSA and other terrorist groups in Syria is either welcomed, swept under the carpet or it means the same forces will obtain more funding and training from the enemies of this country. All in all, so-called opposition forces can gang rape Christian girls, use chemicals, behead people, cut open Syrian soldiers, murder Alawites, kill pro-Sunni Muslim clerics, kidnap Christian bishops and other brutal realities. After all, the red line only applies to the side which is protecting minorities therefore Gulf petrodollars can openly support barbarity – while NATO Turkey is a conduit for military arms and international jihadists. 
Only compliant media groups could peddle the spin emanating from the Obama administration and which is being endorsed by France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Read the full article HERE.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.


5 comments:

Ohio JOE said...

Great post Bosman, I among others would like to know the answer to that question.

BOSMAN said...

Obama has been a hypocrite and a Silent enabler of terrorism when it comes to the persecutions and killings of Christians and other minorities in Syria and other Muslim Countries.

Obviously as far as he was concerned, NO RED LINES were needed until it was Muslim against Muslim.

Anonymous said...

I don't think I've heard Obama say anything about the murders and persecutions of Christians, nor the rapes. Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem like he has. In fact, you might think he would say something about the subjugation of Muslim women, but I don't think I've heard it.

He did say that the future does not belong to those who would slander the prophet of Islam.

-Martha

Anonymous said...

For a man whose talents seem to be pretty exclusive to the area of rhetoric, I also believe that our President has been curiously silent about the terrible persecutions of Christians and the subjugation of women in these countries.

AZ

Anonymous said...

I also wanted to point out that our Church has started a new website and facebook page dedicated to educating people on the issues of religious freedom. Information and links can be found at lds.org. Maybe you would like to post about it, Martha. This is specifically created to get people thinking about this important issue. I thought some people on this site might be interested in looking it up.

AZ