I don't know this female columnist. But if I did, I'd keep my male children away from her.
The Article is posted HERE. I refuse to give it any face time on my website. Read it at the Washington Post if you like.
Below is Bill O'Reilly take on this:
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.
2 comments:
I'd call this woman a slut, but that would be insulting to most sluts who would find her opinion on this issue disgusting.
Yeah, she's a horrible monster, right?
With a few exceptions, in all of Europe, she could have had sex if the kid had been 16.
The exceptions:
It would have been okay if the kid was 15 in France, Iceland, Denmark, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, and Austria.
She could have had sex with the exact same 14 year-old in Italy, Germany, Poland, Austria, Turkey,and Portugal, as well as China and 90% of South America, and nobody would call her a "monster," because they think it's perfectly okay.
In Japan, Mexico, and Spain, the kid could have been 13. Hey, no problem!
And those are just the countries you know. Almost all the others don't see anything wrong with having sex with a 14 or 15 year-old.
Ireland is the only country in Europe prudish enough to allow sex with 17 year-olds or older.
But according to American Federal law, a "minor" means under 18. You're a MONSTER if you look at naked pictures of them.
Now, you'll say "Okay, but here in America, "minor" means 18."
Yes, that's exactly my point:
VIRTUALLY EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THINKS IT'S OKAY AND LEGAL TO HAVE SEX WITH "KIDS" THAT WOULD GET YOU 30 YEARS IN THE U.S. JUST FOR LOOKING AT THEIR PICTURE.
Is everyone in Japan, Europe, and South America a "monster," like you say this woman is?
Well?
That's not a rhetorical question.
Or do you, perhaps, understand why virtually everyone in every other civilized country in the world thinks America is run by freedom-hating idiots?
--faye kane ♀ girl brain
Post a Comment