Op-ed:
General Carter Ham...the man to take the Obama regime down...but will he
By: Diane Sori
General Carter Ham...the man to take the Obama regime down...but will he
By: Diane Sori
Point
blank...four-star General Carter Ham answers directly to the
President of the United States and NO one else...he does not work for
the State Department and did NOT work for then Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton on the fateful night of September 11, 2012.
And
today, General Ham testifies before the House Oversight Committee at a 'closed door' hearing scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m.
this morning (too bad the 'in-the-pocket' for Obama msm seems to be keeping that
hush-hush). As the head of AFRICOM when our Benghazi compound was
under attack, General Ham knows exactly what happened, and most
importantly, he knows who gave the order to 'stand down'...the order directly leading to the deaths of Ambassador
Christopher Stevens, Inform Officer
Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty.
And
General Ham knows, because while the attack was going on he just 'happened' to
be in D.C. for meetings, and just 'happened' to be in the National Military Command
Center, the war operations center in the Pentagon.
General
Carter Ham, the man who became a four-star general in August 2008...AFRICOM commander forced to retire
(just a few years shy of his mandatory retirement date) from a post
with a three-year rotation after only serving for one and a half
years, and with his replacement put in charge right on the heels of
the Benghazi attacks... and replaced with General David Rodriquez
(became a four-star general in September of 2011) who only served in his previous position (Commanding
General of the United States Army Forces Command) for 14 months
instead of the usual three year rotation schedule...a bit odd if you
ask me as this position is based out of the US, a desk job really,
and AFRICOM takes in nations that are at the center of the world's
most dangerous hot spots.
But
NO matter as NOTHING can change the fact that to issue an order to
'stand down' there's a certain military protocol that's followed when
an attack like Benghazi occurs...a specific chain of command for
allowing special-forces to go in and rescue or aid our people.
And that chain would have started with SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant
Colonel Gibson who would have first contacted a desk officer, asking
for that permission. The desk officer would then have to call
Marine Corps Colonel George Bristol, commander of the Joint Special
Operations Task Force-Trans Sahara. Then Col. Bristol would have to
contact Rear Admiral Brian Losey, then Commander of Special
Operations Command Africa, who then would have to contact the
aforementioned General Ham, commander of AFRICOM, for the final go
order.
This
would be the chain of command designated by military protocol...but
was this chain of command actually followed...or did Obama make that
'stand down' call himself or directly order General Ham to make it
after the initial Benghazi briefing, because he knew a rescue team
would wanted to be sent in. And I believe Obama knew that he
could NOT let that happen, because Ambassador Stevens could NOT be
allowed to survive with the information Obama suspected Stevens had
discovered about his guns and weapons running to the al-Qaeda backed
Syrian rebels.
Conspiracy
theory on my part...NO I don't think so for the pieces of the
Benghazi puzzle are starting to fit together...and fit together for
the simple fact that if there was NOTHING to hide why then all the
cover-ups...why did Obama continue to lie to the
American people for weeks about the true nature of Ambassador
Stevens' murder when NOT even an hour into the attack the CIA
identified the attack as a coordinated terrorist effort of al-Qaeda
operatives...why the lies...why the subterfuge...and why all of a
sudden is scandal after scandal being lobed at Obama...lobed at Obama
to divert our attention away from the truth about Benghazi as none of
the other scandals can lead to Obama's downfall...that designation
goes to Benghazi alone.
Remember
also that whistleblower Greg Hicks testified before the committee
that special forces were ready to board a plane in Tripoli, and that
even after they got word that Stevens was dead, Hicks said, “The
Libyan military agreed to fly their C-130 to Benghazi and carry
additional personnel to Benghazi as reinforcements,” including US
Special Forces, but that a call came through from Special Operations
Command Africa saying, “you can’t go now; you don’t have
authority to go now." Also, Special Forces in Italy, less
than one hour or so away, suited up and ready to go, were told to
wait, or got NO orders at all.
And
so three more Americans were murdered after Stevens because of that
'stand down' order,
and
like I said there is
only one person who can give that order, and that is the President of
the United States. But
we must know NOT only who gave that order but the truth of why was
such an order given in the first place...why were four Americans left
to be slaughtered by islamic terrorists while help was close by for
being left to be slaughtered is as much blood on this president's
hands as if he pulled the trigger that slaughtered our people
himself.
I
think I hit on that answer pretty well (guns and weapons smuggling to
Syria), and that answer is indeed grounds for treason to be levied
against Barack HUSSEIN Obama NOT only for 'aiding and abetting the
enemy' but also for dereliction of duty.
America
has a long and honorable history of never leaving people behind, and
by willfully and knowingly doing so, as Commander-in-Chief of our
military, Barack HUSSEIN Obama can be charged with dereliction of
duty...a
specific offense under United States Code Title 10,892. Article 92,
saying that in times of war punishment can include sanctions up to
and including the death penalty, and that in and of itself is reason
enough for all the lies and cover-ups I would say.
Remember,
Obama had plenty of time to call General Ham at AFRICOM...hell, he just had to make
a local call to Ham at the Pentagon...and issue the 'stand
down' order without any witnesses, because for all intents and
purposes, after he took the original call from the Department of
Defense, Obama was absent when the major part of the attack was going
on...claiming he had to get ready for his trip to a Las Vegas
fundraiser the next morning, telling his people to 'handle it'.
But
the bottom line remains that General Ham knows the truth about
everything that happened that night...but will he talk...will he end
an illustrious military career taking the fall for Barack HUSSEIN
Obama or will payback be a b*tch for this miserable excuse of a
president and those who orbit around him...those who forced this man
into retirement to try and silence him.
It can go either way but
which way is the million dollar question that hopefully will be
answered today...and answered with the groundwork being laid for a charge of treason to be brought against Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
4 comments:
Diane, you just drive me crazy. You do your homework so well, and provide good information. Then you have to go and seriously say it can go either way.
It's not even a remote possibility that anyone will stick their neck out. But gosh I wish you were right.
-Martha
I'm just hoping that as a military man whose first loyalty is to the Constitution and NOT to the president that Gen. Ham will do the right thing.
If he reports only to Obama and is in a closed door meeting about Benghazi, then it's done. We will never hear the truth about what happened or Obama's involvement.
Hopefully someone in that room will 'leak' something.
Post a Comment