Monday, January 7, 2013

Florida Judge refuses to hear a case on a Presidential candidates eligibility requirements because kids know Santa Claus Exists

Florida Circuit Judge Kevin Carroll, who previously cited the fictitious judge in “Miracle on 34th Street” in a ruling, now says he’s done with arguments over Barack Obama’s eligibility. 
Carroll released an order today refusing to hear a request for a hearing that is allowed under state law when there are doubts about a candidate’s eligibility. And let that be the last, the judge said. 
“No petitions for clarification or further rehearing will be entertained by the court,” he said in his ruling that refused to respond to a request for the state-allowed hearing in a case brought by Michael Voeltz. 
[...]
The Attorney of the plaintiff Larry Klayman noted:
...the judge had promised the plaintiffs time to respond to an Obama motion to dismiss the case but then dismissed it without allowing the time frame to expire.
It's not going to end here. Klayman promised to take it to the appellate level.

Read the whole story HERE.

The reasoning for this judges decision proves he's incompetent. His reasoning is reminiscent of the court scene in 'Miracle on 34th street':
This court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses and meets with congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world,” Carroll wrote.
The problem with this reasoning is That it doesn't address the eligibility argument. Besides, St. Nicholas wasn't born in the U.S. He was born in Turkey.

It's funny though that he chose the Santa Clause argument from a movie. Because President Obama got re-elected playing Santa Clause with tax payers money to gullible Americans.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.

5 comments:

newark hawk said...

"My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House ... There is probable cause that the document is a forgery."~Joe Arpaio, Sheriff, Maricopa County, AZ

newark hawk said...

"The only evidence of defendant Obama's alleged birth within the United States has come in the form of a belatedly filed electronic version of a claimed long-form birth certificate posted on the Internet."~Larry Klayman, plaintiff's attorney & founder of 'Freedom Watch'

newark hawk said...

""Zullo's[Investigator Mike Zullo] testimony is that forgery was committed to create the document, and fraud was committed in "presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery the White House represents as proof positive of President Obama's" birth documentation.""

newark hawk said...

"If defendant Obama is found to be ineligible, which is likely to happen since there is no evidence Obama was born in the United States to U.S. citizen parents, the plaintiff's vote in the 2012 presidential election will be nullified."~Larry Klayman, plaintiff's attorney & founder of 'Freedom Watch'

newark hawk said...

It's very telling that media talking heads who defend Obama on the eligibility issue, can only do so when they're unchallenged by opposing views.

They wouldn't dare allow the likes of Larry Klayman in their television and radio studios to refute their propaganda, demagoguery and lies.

They can't defend what's indefensible.