Saturday, November 17, 2012

If Bush 1 or 2, Reagan, or even Clinton were still President would we be reading headlines like this?

Liberated Iraq calls on Arab states to use oil as 'weapon' against U.S.:
"Iraq will invite (Arab) ministers to use the weapon of oil, with the aim of asserting real pressure on the United States and whoever stands with Israel," Qais al-Azzawy told reporters in Cairo on Friday.
The answer is NO! Because Iraq would have known ahead of time that these Presidents would not have stood for it.

I can imagine President Reagan on the phone now with his Iraqi counterpart...."What do you mean, YOUR OIL?....."

I wonder what President Obama's response to this will be (IF ANY)? Somewhere in it I'm sure they'll be an apology.

If you like what you see, please "Like" us on Facebook here.
Please follow us on Twitter here.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It's so obvious you don't know anything about Middle Eastern politics it's funny.

ME governments have consternation been using oil as a weapon, and it's Bush's fault that Iraq is in a position to do so today.

It's also somewhat scary that you seriously seem to think we own Iraq's oil. I've only seen crazy leftists make that mistake before when trying to argue against the war-- but you actually seem to *want* us to waltz into other countries and take their resources. Sick mind.