The absence of Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, at the conference that solidified his celebrity last year, was inaccurately reported as a sign of conservative dissent. Jim DeMint had skipped the conference; Rubio was a protege. Was this a sign of a broader revolt?
The full story is here.
8 comments:
Eeshh....From the aticle:
Cardenas, famously, had supported Charlie Crist over Rubio in the primary.
You're probably looking at the VP candidate for whoever wins the nomination.
He probably does have a future on a ticket, but not until he gets some time under his belt in the Senate.
I have no doubt we are looking at a future Presidential candidate. Maybe 2020!
zeke
Rubio needs to put some time in first before he should be considered for Pres or VP
I'm glad Rubio is showing he's his own man and not a follower.
I agree with all of the comments here.
I really like Rubio, at least what I've seen so far. I could support him for VP, but I would prefer to see him finish his term in the Senate. I'm still leaning towards a Romney/Jindal ticket. Romney/Rubio does have a nice ring to it, though.
Post a Comment