Voter fraud has never been this blatant.
In 2022, with over $100 million spent on a heavily contested mayoral election in Los Angeles, 646,058 votes were cast in the first round of voting
In 2026, with hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on an election most people were ignoring, the current totals for the first round is at a staggering 723,472 votes.
And the election isn’t even done yet.
There had been suspicions about an influx of late arriving ballots that put Karen Bass over the top in 2022 and allowed Los Angeles to burn considering that primary turnout in the previous mayoral elections in 2017 and 2013 had been around 400,000. 2026 looks to double that.
It was already pretty impressive when the voter totals rose around 50% in 2022 even as the population increased by less than 3%, but in a truly miraculous event, they’re now about to rise 100% even as the population shrank and even during expected low voter turnout.
All the reporting indicated low early voting in the LA area only to somehow achieve an unprecedented record turnout on behalf of Mayor Karen Bass who, after letting parts of the city burn and then lying about it, enjoyed a 56% unfavorable rating and only a 31% approval rating.
In 2022, Bass had gotten 278,511 votes in the primary. Now, after burning down the city and having the approval rating of a rotten fish, she’s set to blow past her 2022 primary totals.
How does a politician with a 31% approval rating turn out more voters than she did in 2022?
This was already pretty amazing, but then the miraculous really happened when Councilwoman.
Nithya Raman, who spent less time in the city than I did, who had come in third place on Election Day and lost her own district, somehow surged and won majorities of late ballot drops.
Raman began by picking up 40% of late arriving ballots. Sure, we’ve always been told that Democrats benefit from late-arriving ballots because they just can’t be bothered to vote in person or on time, but this was a unique example of the late-arriving ballots benefiting the losing Dem in such a strategic way as to lock out Spencer Pratt: the non-establishment candidate.
The leftist councilwoman doubled her polling numbers in late arriving ballots, she performed better with those late arriving ballots than the Democrat front runner, and outperformed Pratt even while Bass performed just well enough to loosely keep her roughly 35% front slot.
That’s not the kind of outcome that happens organically in a normal election.
The ‘surge’ of late-arriving ballots, which usually boosts the Democrat front runner, instead boosted the Democrat third runner, while making the general election a battle between two leftist Democrats, one of whom supported Communist Cuba, and an even more radical newcomer. More significantly it shuts down Pratt’s critiques of the same broken system. --->READ MORE HERE
3 reasons this was fraud.
To believe the outcome of the LA mayoral race was legitimate, you also have to believe that ..
1. Turnout for the first round exceeded the turnout for the much more heavily promoted 2022 mayoral election all on behalf of a mayor that polls showed most people didn’t like and another candidate most people had never heard of
2. You also have to believe that not only was there a strong turnout for Mayor Karen Bass, but that bizarrely the 3rd place candidate, Nithya Raman, benefited from the vast majority of late arriving ballots and soared to 2nd place despite losing even her own district.
This becomes even more incredible when you consider that for some peculiar reason the late mail ballots functioned completely differently than the previous votes not only in terms of backing Dems over Republicans, but in terms of backing a specific Democrat, the previous loser, just in time to eliminate the opposition candidate, and turn the final round into a non-contest between two leftists.
3. --->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.
No comments:
Post a Comment