California Bar Strips John Eastman Of Livelihood For Representing A Client With Views It Dislikes:
Stripping Eastman of his livelihood sends a chilling message that representing a client with the ‘wrong’ views is career suicide in Democrat-led states.
The California Supreme Court upheld the disbarment of constitutional scholar and attorney John Eastman on Wednesday for representing President Donald Trump when he questioned the outcome of the 2020 election.
The California State Bar’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel investigated Eastman for advising Trump following the 2020 election. The bar association argued Eastman violated “ethical obligations” by representing Trump in the questioning of the 2020 election. As States United wrote, the bar alleged Eastman tried to “plan, promote, and assist then-President Trump in executing a strategy, unsupported by facts or law, to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election by obstructing the count of electoral votes of certain states.”
But this had nothing to do with “ethics” or even “crime,” and a review of the 11 charges the bar filed against Eastman shows they boil down to one thing: punishing Eastman for representing Trump and raising legitimate questions about the 2020 election results.
For example, one charge alleges Eastman acted with “moral turpitude, dishonesty, and corruption” when he went on Steve Bannon’s War Room to talk about absentee ballot fraud, according to States United. Ballot fraud did — and does — occur. In one example, Zul Mirza Mohamed was sentenced to four years in jail for forging mail-in ballot applications using residents’ names during a 2020 race in which he was a candidate. Ahead of the 2020 election, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) admitted there are a host of issues associated with mass mail-in voting, including difficulty in the “process of mailing and returning ballots,” “high number of improperly completed ballots,” and the “shortage of personnel to process ballots in a prompt manner.”
Another charge targets Eastman’s filing on behalf of his client (Trump) in Texas v. Pennsylvania before the Supreme Court. Texas challenged electoral votes from Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan, arguing that changes to voting rules made by officials rather than the legislature were unconstitutional and therefore undermined the integrity of the results. The Supreme Court ultimately did not hear the case on standing but never ruled on the underlying claims.
Notably, then-Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar circumvented the state legislature when she unilaterally waived the signature verification process for mail-in ballots. Nonetheless, the bar used that case to suggest Eastman sought to “mislead” the high court. --->READ MORE HERE
John Eastman Disbarred For Doing His Job While Felon Who Faked Russia Hoax Docs Got Wrist Slap
The “two-tiered system of justice and of bar discipline” has struck again, as former Trump official Jeffrey Clark put it, with the corrupt courts in California disbarring constitutional lawyer John Eastman for representing his client.
Clark himself has been the target of that same system in Washington, D.C., where the “two-tiered” nature may be the most acute: Left-wing bars will disbar their political enemies, while simultaneously restoring the statuses of convicted Russiagate felons like former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith.
“John [Eastman] represented the President in litigation challenging an election. That’s all. He lied about nothing. Reasonable minds can disagree about the 2020 election,” Clark posted to social media. “He did what lawyers are supposed to do — represent disfavored individuals. And make no mistake, the elites, especially in bar apparatuses, disfavor and hate President Trump and anyone associated with him with a burning passion. No one representing Vice President Gore was disbarred for losing Bush v. Gore where the whole partial county-specific recount strategy Democrat lawyers devised there was ruled an unconstitutional violation of equal protection.”
Eastman lawfully challenged results in the 2020 election the left rigged in numerous ways. Eastman’s job — and any lawyer’s job — is to vigorously represent their clients, and for that, he was disbarred.
The targeting of Eastman has been ongoing for some time, and was always aimed at destroying his life and livelihood while ensuring that left-wing forces can block conservatives from having proper, robust legal representation.
“This is much bigger than my own bar license,” Eastman said in reaction to the disbarment. “What’s going on here is a leftist Marxist capture of our institutions and then weaponizing them to destroy any political opposition to the deep globalist state that is getting entrenched in this country.” --->READ MORE HERE
If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK
here, GETTR
here, and TWITTER
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment