 |
| JAYMANTRI/PEXELS |
It’s not about dogs. It’s about Islam forcing Americans to change our habits and our way of life in order to accommodate Muslims.
Shortly after Nerdeen Kiswani, a pro-Hamas, pro-terrorist activist and organizer, said on X that pet dogs have no place in homes because “they are unclean,” several other videos surfaced reportedly demonstrating Muslim attitudes toward dogs.There’s the video purportedly showing a Muslim threatening to behead a woman’s dog. And the video of “Sneako,” a Muslim streamer in Miami, telling Americans, “F-ck your dog. … Dogs are haram. … Dogs are gross.” And then the video allegedly capturing Muslim kids torturing a lone dog. Added to those were reports of Morocco engaging in a campaign to slaughter three million dogs ahead of the 2030 World Cup.
The obvious conclusion is that Muslim culture does not like dogs and has no qualms about being cruel toward them.
But the issue is not about dogs specifically. It is about Islam forcing Americans — who have been dog-loving and dog-using people since the Mayflower — to change our habits and our way of life in order to accommodate Muslims. It is about conquest and control. As Dana Loesch put it, it is primarily about submission, with Muslims pushing the boundaries of what they can do in America.
In cases like this, it is very important to see who supports the suppressors and who supports the people being told to submit. Unsurprisingly, Democrats haven’t reacted with the common-sense, American response: If you don’t like dogs, don’t have a dog. But we are not going to tell Americans they can’t have dogs or that they cannot have their dogs in their own homes.
Instead, leftists from Jake Tapper to AOC have called Congressman Randy Fine of Florida a “bigot” for responding to Kiswani’s original tweet, with a sentence most Americans would agree with: “If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one.” And the reactions have gone well beyond that. Hakeem Jefferies has promised retribution if the Democrats retake the House in November. Ahead of that threatened retribution, Democrats (and some gutless wonder Republicans, if rumors are to be believed) want Fine to be censured.
It’s important to understand what is unfolding. It is easy to see this as just another example of the left being the left and throwing down the “Racist!” card because that is largely what their entire deck consists of. But it is more than that. The old legal maximum “Silence means consent” (qui tacet consentire videtur) is still true. Every Democrat who has only been able to try and spin this as another example of xenophobic, Islamophobic conservatives proving their xenophobia and Islamophobia is advertising that he is an ally of Islamists — Islamists who, if given the chance, will exert power to change our way of life.
The proof of this is not the fact that Islam is currently the fastest growing religion in the world, while also rising in the United States — religion obviously changed the Roman Empire after Constantine, Mexico after the conquistadors toppled the Aztecs, the Christian Middle East after the Muslims conquered it, so of course an Islam-majority United States isn’t going to be the United States we inherited. Nor is the proof that blue cities like New York are now blasting the Muslim call to prayer, changing their own rules to allow the disturbance. The proof can be seen in Dearborn, Michigan. --->READ MORE HERE
There are pure-tee idiots in every faith, denomination and following.
But at the risk of bringing a fatwah down on my own head, I have to say the proverbial cake has been taken by a Palestinian “activist” celebrating the election of a Muslim mayor in New York City.
The lady caused a bit of controversy when she declared that dogs should not be kept indoors, and under the new Muslim mayor of the Big Apple, that could soon be the law. Non-Islamic New Yorkers will have to change their ways to accommodate Islamists who are scared of or offended by dogs. Among the suggested changes were rules like no longer allowing dogs in parks or on sidewalks, but especially anyplace indoors where a non-dog person might someday pass through and unknowingly become impure. To his credit, Mamdani has had enough sense to keep his mouth shut on this one.
Depending on how fundamentalist the sect is, some Islamists firmly believe that dogs are by their very nature unclean, except for hunting and herding animals, and therefore they must be avoided and in many cases killed.
Remember how al Quaida demonstrated chemical agents on puppies in some of their videos right after 9/11? That’s an extreme example, but ask some of the veterans of Afghanistan and the Global War on Terror how folks in some Islamic countries feel about dogs.
At the same time, I knew a Muslim man in Wilmington who held two kids at gunpoint when they were trying to kick a stray dog to death. My friend adopted that dog, and kept him inside the house. There were never any children better protected than those of my friend. He’s the same one who helped me fish a drowning puppy out of a storm drain once during an almost-tropical storm. He may not have been a good Muslim by the standards of many folks, but he was a better man.
Once again, I am glad to be a Christian and a Baptist.
Years ago, Miss Rhonda and I had a Boxer who went to church every Sunday. Grizzly was content to sleep in the back seat of the car when the weather was right (much like many churchgoers of many faiths, but that’s neither here nor there.) He would come out and play during outside events like picnics and Vacation Bible School. Indeed, the Sunday School superintendent half-jokingly put him on the rolls, and kept up with his attendance.
History is replete with dogs who went to church; some waited outside (as did one of mine when I was a little kid) and others just walked in the front door and took a place on the Amen pew (not my dog that time, but I was there).
I am not going to argue whether or not animals go to Heaven. That’s a theological and eschatological column for another day. What I will say that is 95 percent of the dogs I have ever met have a pure heart. I will take a dog over most people any day of the week, and I honestly do like a lot of folks. It’s just that in a lot of cases, I like my dogs better. Heck, I may even like the dogs better than the owners, for that matter.
So for someone who hates America, who is looking forward to the Islamic socialization of the once great, now lost city of New York, to say folks need to get rid of their dogs to avoid offending other folks – well, I take issue with that. --->READ MORE HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment