tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post4776632408811252629..comments2024-03-29T03:23:34.859-04:00Comments on RIGHT SPEAK: Enough With The False Narrative About Palin's VettingBOSMANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13613253160155525089noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-22578464229084803072012-04-26T13:33:13.907-04:002012-04-26T13:33:13.907-04:00Tolerating Mitt Romney for the good of the country...Tolerating Mitt Romney for the good of the country is difficult. I don't like him and I don't trust him. My prayer is still that in August, the delegates will see this convention as an opportunity to reach for the greatest future for America, which would be the nomination of a Palin/West ticket for 2012. <br /><br />And to answer the rhetorical question everyone seems to be floating, those who are critical of Sarah Palin are trying their best to convince themselves and anyone who will listen that it is okay for republicans not to have their A-TEAM if they can diminish that which they fear. <br /><br />They know they can't control Sarah, that she can't be "bought off", that she will stand with determination for what is right for this country, and she is the absolute greatest threat to crony politics and the d.c. way of life. They know that Col. West possesses the same fierce patriotism and relentless resolve, and that together, Palin/West would fulfill their oaths of office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-14360989643140052752012-04-25T10:21:55.298-04:002012-04-25T10:21:55.298-04:00lol 10:48, your understanding of and deep apprecia...lol 10:48, your understanding of and deep appreciation for Palin came after watching "the Undefeated" LOL. Didnt Palin get a worst actress nomination for that movie, where she is playing HERSELF? lolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-16975952058427136542012-04-25T09:45:08.878-04:002012-04-25T09:45:08.878-04:001048. Bull pucky. Many GOP's went to vote fo...1048. Bull pucky. Many GOP's went to vote for Obama BECAUSE they feared for McCain's health and this vapid woman taking the country.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-22212575959054514162012-04-24T22:48:07.895-04:002012-04-24T22:48:07.895-04:00Sarah Palin would of beat the non-vetted Obama han...Sarah Palin would of beat the non-vetted Obama hands down if she had been at the top of the ticket and not McCain. She would of exposed him for the one he really is.<br /><br />She was vetted more than any candidate and still continues to be vetted to this day. <br /><br />Anyone who watches the movie "The Undefeated" realizes just how much Sarah would of done for this country. She was the only candidate to have a Top Secret Clearance when she was running and she did not get that by being stupid. How many of you have really searched out her true record. She is above all the candidates including Mit Romney. I would be honored to have her as my President.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-17853881907104742512012-04-24T20:24:04.294-04:002012-04-24T20:24:04.294-04:00McCain went for the sizzle and fogot to check if t...McCain went for the sizzle and fogot to check if there was any steak.<br /><br />There wasn't.<br /><br />That doesn't mean sizzle isn't important, it is to degree. But sizzles fade and if there is no good steak to cut into, the meal is a loss.<br /><br />So after the Palin's sizzle began to fade, it was clear this only a minutue steak and not a Porterhouse.<br /><br />The countless vapid Fox News/Sean Hannity interviews, where the answers were telegraphed in the questions, revealed Palin was more Mc Donalds than Ruth's Chris.Doug NYC GOPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00457483710583021449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-22931609285688987752012-04-24T17:16:54.007-04:002012-04-24T17:16:54.007-04:00I say she has been vetted more than any Republican...I say she has been vetted more than any Republican candidate. I haven't seen any of Romney's emails while he was governor. <br /><br />But, let's see how the Mittster holds up in the light and afterwards we can compare notes, shall we?n4cerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13325097759001717077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-33171199228787679672012-04-24T15:53:29.459-04:002012-04-24T15:53:29.459-04:00I'm a financially wealthy Independent woman wh...I'm a financially wealthy Independent woman who-after the 2010 election- is no longer a registered Republican.<br /><br />Romneyrots better understand that their candidate has already lost my campaign cash and my time spent getting out the vote for their candidate.<br /><br />If Romeneyrots want to also lose my vote (isn't Mitt is supposed to be better than Obama?) then they should continue their misquided tactic of trashing those who represent the Conservative base.<br /><br />Trashing the Conservative base failed McCain, hopefully Romney is smart enough to not do the same.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-50816205474308678212012-04-24T15:46:21.904-04:002012-04-24T15:46:21.904-04:00"That might be old guys who are stuck in the ..."That might be old guys who are stuck in the past, but they were also people who did not know her and were suspicious of how she got that position."<br /><br />True but mostly they were hate-raging Feminists who misgynistically had to destroy a woman with whom they could never complete against at home or at work. Feminists had to destroy Sarah Pain because they could stand seeing themselves as life's ultimate losers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-11596864479307981902012-04-24T15:44:36.048-04:002012-04-24T15:44:36.048-04:00hardly false. she was a disaster and continues to ...hardly false. she was a disaster and continues to embarrass the party and herself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-30806544029697255842012-04-24T15:40:11.866-04:002012-04-24T15:40:11.866-04:00"But if I knew Sarah Palin then, the way I kn..."But if I knew Sarah Palin then, the way I know her now, I am not sure I would be so surprised. So no...she was not fully vetted."<br /><br />See what happens to the brain stuck inside Buil Maher's comedy canal, the brain turn to mush.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-4586811020043150062012-04-24T10:20:52.337-04:002012-04-24T10:20:52.337-04:00In 2008 the election centered around issues that w...In 2008 the election centered around issues that were clearly strengths for Romney and yet McCain chose Palin. If there is blame to go around it falls squarely on McCain and his advisers. He was a weak candidate and he took a calculated risk and it didn't work. End of story.Joel2012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-65584510708952490432012-04-24T08:53:51.991-04:002012-04-24T08:53:51.991-04:00Sarah Palin is so 2008. Now it's 2012. Don&#...Sarah Palin is so 2008. Now it's 2012. Don't be a dinosaur.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-55332198313772451952012-04-24T06:40:32.931-04:002012-04-24T06:40:32.931-04:00And something else, I knew a lot of conservatives ...And something else, I knew a lot of conservatives who refused to vote because she was on the ticket...they said they would not vote for "that woman". That might be old guys who are stuck in the past, but they were also people who did not know her and were suspicious of how she got that position.Terryehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15226693134160057218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-50154243269322037802012-04-24T06:38:20.032-04:002012-04-24T06:38:20.032-04:00I was not bitter because McCain picked Sarah Palin...I was not bitter because McCain picked Sarah Palin over Romney. I was surprised, but it was a good surprise...back then. But if I knew Sarah Palin then, the way I know her now, I am not sure I would be so surprised. So no...she was not fully vetted.Terryehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15226693134160057218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-75914842484957432012-04-24T06:11:58.257-04:002012-04-24T06:11:58.257-04:00vetted or not, palin was/is incompetent and inexpe...vetted or not, palin was/is incompetent and inexperienced to be president. she can talk the talk but can never walk the walk. judge people by their actions not by what they say. Romney said liberal positions in the past but his deeds/accomplishments/actions were more conservative positions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-58428703931700982792012-04-24T05:56:14.503-04:002012-04-24T05:56:14.503-04:00An yes, the Rombots are not bitter about Sarah bei...An yes, the Rombots are not bitter about Sarah being selected for VP.<br /><br />With the way that Obama became the "Promised One" candidate, nobody on the GOP side had a prayer.<br /><br />If Mitt had been on the ticket, the ABRs would have blamed him for the loss and he wouldn't be the nominee now.....So, nope, no bitterness whatsoever :DJeraldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-4377342742961295002012-04-24T05:53:51.219-04:002012-04-24T05:53:51.219-04:00That was it? That was the "full vetting"...That was it? That was the "full vetting" of Palin? An interview? She hit a couple of answers out of the park? That's what we call vetting now a days?<br /><br />Good grief...Jeraldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-32651865692908292812012-04-24T04:21:43.176-04:002012-04-24T04:21:43.176-04:00Would like a side order of Bitter to go along with...Would like a side order of Bitter to go along with your Sour Grapes?Doug NYC GOPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00457483710583021449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-17945506660824379262012-04-24T01:04:24.318-04:002012-04-24T01:04:24.318-04:00Palin had good natural political ability, but as C...Palin had good natural political ability, but as Charles K and others have noted, was unable or unwilling to put in the time to get up to snuff on the issues. She was just too far behind. A lifetime of reading People Magazine will not get you ready for the national ticket.cimbrihttp://www.yahoo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-89692993406095705852012-04-24T00:35:33.890-04:002012-04-24T00:35:33.890-04:00Axelrod will just replay these statements back,
...Axelrod will just replay these statements back,<br /><br /><br />http://gop12.thehill.com/2012/04/when-romneys-press-secretary-savaged.html<br /><br />Bush picked Cheney, and he went to<br />a virtual tie, versus Al Gore,narcisohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11082023858427818263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-14402611856668689572012-04-24T00:30:59.172-04:002012-04-24T00:30:59.172-04:00There's a lot of evidence out there both trash...There's a lot of evidence out there both trashing Palin and supporting Palin but personally I think the best evidence comes right from the source itself. You don't need to be a rocket scientist, or even a 5th grader hoping to be a rocket scientist to know that Sarah Palin os full of B.S. and dumber than bag of pop-rocks. In fact, all one needs to do is listen to her open her mouth for more than 10 seconds. The evidence is really quite astounding. So, the speculation on all of this really isn't necessary since the proof stands before us as a commentator on Foxnews.<br /><br />The debate we should be having is why McCain would try to pawn such an idiotic VP candidate on the American People. It's really almost an insult to the intelligence of the GOP electorate. But then again, there are still those who adore her, while at the same time voted for Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum thinking that either of them had the ethical fortitude to be President. So really, we should all be upset that McCain exposed the ultra right wing of the party as a bunch of zombie voters bent of electing the dumbest President they can possibly relate to.<br /><br />Thank heavens the "establishment" saved us from our moronic selves and actually backed a man with brains for the the nomination. SOmething tells me the Mitt is smart enough not to make the mistake of 2008, or 1988 for that matter when we got stuck with Palin's intellectual grandfather - Dan Quayle.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-31540345570454486432012-04-24T00:00:28.542-04:002012-04-24T00:00:28.542-04:00Palin is a Super Star...of course those that vette...Palin is a Super Star...of course those that vetted Sarah could see it...My personal opinion is that McCain throwing Sarah to the world in order to "shock" the electorate was the mistake...not the vetting. McCain was the reason Sarah had her stumbles...it is what it is...again, personally, I get Sarah's brand and understand why it resonates so deep, and I think Sarah Palin is going to be around for a long long time. <br /><br />GordonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-3034693429307194012012-04-23T23:44:49.350-04:002012-04-23T23:44:49.350-04:00Sorry for the typo.Sorry for the typo.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-91525678669168926792012-04-23T23:43:10.857-04:002012-04-23T23:43:10.857-04:00RW, It was not hard to see from day one that Palin...RW, It was not hard to see from day one that Palin was not vetted, and I said that very thing from the first week. So did many others, because they could plainly see reality. I really don't care what Culvahouse says to CYA. It only took ONE INTERVIEW to expose Palin. And of course, they didn't do enough digging on Troopergate, and many other things.<br /><br />RW, it's so silly of you to say some Romney supporters still have an ax to grind because Mitt was not chosen. Maybe the first week or so, but after that it was plain to see that Mitt dodged a huge bullet. No one cared after that.<br /><br />And the dig at MRC is cheap, especially for someone who is a devoted C4P follower. LOL! At least the MRC folks are living in reality.<br /><br />I do agree with you that continuing to point out Palin's flaws/realities might alienate her supporters. But then you posted this, so you are obviously goading us into it. I'm happy to oblige.<br /><br />Anyone, for anyone with eyes to see in 08, it was clear that Palin was not vetted near enough.<br /><br />-MarthaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3571954475140446599.post-1671509511761219432012-04-23T23:39:28.517-04:002012-04-23T23:39:28.517-04:00all i will say is that its 2012 and palin isnt on ...all i will say is that its 2012 and palin isnt on the list so why keep bringing her up. move on to who might b e on the list this year and write something useful about themcorepnoreply@blogger.com