Saturday, February 12, 2011

CPAC 2011: So much for the Marco Rubio boycott:


The absence of Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, at the conference that solidified his celebrity last year, was inaccurately reported as a sign of conservative dissent. Jim DeMint had skipped the conference; Rubio was a protege. Was this a sign of a broader revolt?


The full story is here.
at

8 comments:

  1. Right WingnutFebruary 12, 2011 at 12:14 PM

    Eeshh....From the aticle:

    Cardenas, famously, had supported Charlie Crist over Rubio in the primary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM

    You're probably looking at the VP candidate for whoever wins the nomination.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnnFebruary 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM

    He probably does have a future on a ticket, but not until he gets some time under his belt in the Senate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 12, 2011 at 7:32 PM

    I have no doubt we are looking at a future Presidential candidate. Maybe 2020!

    zeke

    ReplyDelete
  5. ConManFebruary 12, 2011 at 7:57 PM

    Rubio needs to put some time in first before he should be considered for Pres or VP

    ReplyDelete
  6. kellyFebruary 12, 2011 at 8:41 PM

    I'm glad Rubio is showing he's his own man and not a follower.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Revolution 2012February 12, 2011 at 9:11 PM

    I agree with all of the comments here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. NoelleFebruary 12, 2011 at 11:22 PM

    I really like Rubio, at least what I've seen so far. I could support him for VP, but I would prefer to see him finish his term in the Senate. I'm still leaning towards a Romney/Jindal ticket. Romney/Rubio does have a nice ring to it, though.

    ReplyDelete